Semi-automatic Construction Hazard Identification Method Using 4D BIM

Heidary, Mohammad Saeed; Mousavi, Milad; Alvanchi, Amin; Barati, Khalegh; Karimi, Hossein

doi:10.22260/isarc2021/0080

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In these cases, some elements have been removed from the building model (to imitate an unfinished building) or only performed at the top level (i.e., the roof). The automated approaches need to incorporate the schedule to determine when an element is built, and thereby the construction scene changes (Heidary et al., 2021; Jin et al., 2019). This work aims to facilitate the temporal analysis of the construction safety situation.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hazard ontology and 4D benchmark model for facilitation of automated construction safety requirement analysis

Johansen

Schultz

Teizer

2023

Computer aided Civil Eng

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the last two decades, numerous approaches have been developed for automating construction safety assessment, that is, prevention through design and planning (PtD/P), that overcome the limitations of a purely manual safety assessment process. Despite this, such automated approaches are yet to be widely adopted in practice. Barriers include a lack of standardization of construction safety concepts within regulatory frameworks and a lack of confidence in automated approaches on the part of practitioners. This work presents a freely available 4D BIM‐based benchmark model (3D Building Information Model and 68 schedules) and construction safety ontology covering the two most frequent and severe construction site accidents: falls from height and struck‐by falling object hazards. The benchmark model and ontology enable the construction safety community to test and compare the performance of alternative automated approaches. Moreover, they are utilized in our PtD/P tool SafeConAI, and empirical evaluation results show how the safety situation changes among different construction schedules of the same project.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hazard ontology and 4D benchmark model for facilitation of automated construction safety requirement analysis

Johansen

Schultz

Teizer

2023

Computer aided Civil Eng

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…From the perspective of safety management and planning, through BIM 4D's simulation and visualization of the green building construction progress, BIM can conduct risk identification and safety training for management personnel and construction workers [135][136][137][138][139]. Moreover, through the BIM 4D hazard identification component established by Heidary et al [140], BIM can assist green building construction managers in identifying and demonstrating the potential construction hazards in the early stages of green building projects [140].…”

Section: Planning and Schedule Management Optimizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, In BIM 4D, the stakeholders can become familiar with the conditions of buildings at different periods through visual 3D demonstrations [100,[117][118][119][120][121][122]142,143,145,164]. From the perspective of safety management, BIM's visualization can assist construction teams in identifying the clashes and potential risks in a visual manner, so as to provide the corresponding safety training and avoid delay, construction waste production, and rework [5,14,46,99,133,135,136,[138][139][140].…”

Section: Bim Utilization In the Green Building Construction Phasementioning

confidence: 99%

Green Building Construction: A Systematic Review of BIM Utilization

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As a multi-function method, Building Information Modeling (BIM) can assist construction organizations in improving their project’s quality, optimize collaboration efficiency, and reduce construction periods and expenditure. Given the distinguished contributions of BIM utilization, there is a trend that BIM has significant potential to be utilized in the construction phase of green buildings. Compared with traditional buildings, green buildings have more stringent requirements, including environmental protection, saving energy, and residents’ comfort. Although BIM is deemed an effective method to achieve the abovementioned requirements in the construction process of green buildings, there are few systematic reviews that explore the capabilities of BIM in the construction phase of green buildings. This has hindered the utilization of BIM in the construction of green buildings. To bridge this research gap and review the latest BIM capabilities, this study was developed to perform a systematic review of the BIM capabilities in the construction phase of green buildings. In this systematic review, the PRISMA protocol has been used as the primary procedure for article screening and review. The entire systematic review was performed from January 2022 to April 2022. In this process, 165 articles were included, reviewed, and discussed. Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus were adopted as the databases. Through this systematic review, it can be identified that BIM capabilities have significant advantages in project quality improvement, lifecycle data storage and management, collaboration optimization, planning, and schedule management optimization in the construction phase of green buildings. Through the discussion, it can be concluded that BIM utilization can be adopted from the pre-construction phase to the post-construction stage in the green building construction process. Besides these, the barriers to BIM utilization in the green building construction phase are also revealed in the discussion section, including the non-uniform data format, insufficient interactivity, ambiguous ownership, insufficient BIM training, and hesitation toward BIM adoption. Moreover, the challenges and future directions of BIM utilization in green building construction are identified. The findings of this study can facilitate construction personnel to be acquainted with BIM capabilities in the construction of green buildings to promote the utilization and optimization of BIM capabilities in the green building construction process.

show abstract

Semi-automatic Construction Hazard Identification Method Using 4D BIM

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Hazard ontology and 4D benchmark model for facilitation of automated construction safety requirement analysis

Hazard ontology and 4D benchmark model for facilitation of automated construction safety requirement analysis

Green Building Construction: A Systematic Review of BIM Utilization

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About