2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12526-017-0634-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-automated software for dorsal fin photographic identification of marine species: application to Carcharodon carcharias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in dorsal fin shape are used broadly to distinguish and identify specimens at different taxonomic levels (Andreotti et al, 2018;Yahn et al, 2019) confirming the reliability of this approach for the purposes of our study. In this perspective, the creation of a public database of shark fins, along with the implementation of the landmarks-based techniques, could promote the development of reliable and easy-touse tools for a quick identification in the field (http:// www.fao.org/ipoa-sharks/tools/software/isharkfin/en/).…”
Section: Morphometric Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Differences in dorsal fin shape are used broadly to distinguish and identify specimens at different taxonomic levels (Andreotti et al, 2018;Yahn et al, 2019) confirming the reliability of this approach for the purposes of our study. In this perspective, the creation of a public database of shark fins, along with the implementation of the landmarks-based techniques, could promote the development of reliable and easy-touse tools for a quick identification in the field (http:// www.fao.org/ipoa-sharks/tools/software/isharkfin/en/).…”
Section: Morphometric Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Survey respondents that reported using computer vision systems in their photo-ID process were most likely to use the finFindR R application (Thompson et al, 2021; N = 15), followed by Flukebook (Blount et al, 2020;Blount et al, 2022a; N = 5), Darwin (Wilkin et al, 1998; N = 4), and Finscan (Hillman et al, 2002; N = 2). FinBase (Adams et al, 2006), ACDSee ( © ACD Systems International Inc., 2018), a Google Application (Mann, 2018), Identifin Software (Andreotti et al, 2018), and Photo-ID Ninja (available online at https://photoid.ninja/) were also each listed once by users (Figure 3B).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leafsnap, using leaf images to identify tree species; Kumar et al, ). And, going beyond fully automated species identification, programs similar to facial recognition software could be used within EM systems to identify individual organisms that are recaptured in a fishery (including endangered, threatened and protected [ETP] species) (Andreotti et al, ; Moya et al, ), to augment the understanding of post‐release survival and population sizes, similar to mark and recapture studies.…”
Section: Results: Methods To Expand Data Fields and Improve The Accurmentioning
confidence: 99%