2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10115-009-0217-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-automated schema integration with SASMINT

Abstract: The emergence of increasing number of collaborating organizations has made clear the need for supporting interoperability infrastructures, enabling sharing and exchange of data among organizations. Schema matching and schema integration are the crucial components of the interoperability infrastructures, and their semi-automation to interrelate or integrate heterogeneous and autonomous databases in collaborative networks is desired. The Semi-Automatic Schema Matching and INTegration (SASMINT) System introduced … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhao and Ram [26] took into account the instance information in the process of integrating heterogeneous data sources. In one of the recent efforts, Ozgul and Afsarmanesh [27] used a variety of metrics and algorithms from the domains of Natural Language Processing and Graph theory for schema matching.…”
Section: Schema Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhao and Ram [26] took into account the instance information in the process of integrating heterogeneous data sources. In one of the recent efforts, Ozgul and Afsarmanesh [27] used a variety of metrics and algorithms from the domains of Natural Language Processing and Graph theory for schema matching.…”
Section: Schema Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of such constraints are data types, value ranges, uniqueness, optionality, relationship types, and cardinalities. For instance, OntoMatch [12], DIKE [13], and SASMINT [14] use this type of matcher. Our approach is different, since we use an uncertain approach for modeling and generating mediated schemas.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semantic similarities and differences are difficult to recognize and resolve, it needs to understand the intended meaning of a concept for each element ( [5], [6]). The semantic conflict of schema during the schema integration can be in terms of naming conflict (homonym and synonym), type conflict, key and cardinality conflict, and etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%