Abstract:The calculation of the collapse load of spherical domes is addressed using a semi-analytical approach under the hypotheses of small displacements and perfect plasticity. The procedure is based on the numerical approximation of the self-stress that represents the projection of the balance equilibrium null space on a finite dimensional manifold. The so obtained self-equilibrated stress span is superimposed to a finite element linear elastic solution to the prescribed loads yielding to the statically admissible s… Show more
Nowadays, engineers possess a wealth of numerical packages in order to design civil engineering structures. The finite element method offers a variety of sophisticated element types, nonlinear materials, and solution algorithms, which enable engineers to confront complicated design problems. However, one of the difficult tasks is the verification of the produced numerical results. The present paper deals with the in-depth verification of a basic problem, referring to the axisymmetric loading by edge forces/moments of a spherical dome, truncated at various roll-down angles, φo. Two formulations of analytical solutions are derived by the bibliography; their results are compared with those produced by the implementation of the finite element method. Modelling details, such as the finite element type, orientation of joints, application of loading, boundary conditions, and results’ interpretation, are presented thoroughly. Four different ratios of the radius of curvature, r and shell’s thickness, and t are examined in order to investigate the compatibility between the implementation of the finite element method to the “first-order” shell theory. The discussion refers to the differences not only between the numerical and analytical results, but also between the two analytical approaches. Furthermore, it emphasizes the necessity of contacting even linear elastic preliminary verification numerical tests as a basis for the construction of more elaborated and sophisticated models.
Nowadays, engineers possess a wealth of numerical packages in order to design civil engineering structures. The finite element method offers a variety of sophisticated element types, nonlinear materials, and solution algorithms, which enable engineers to confront complicated design problems. However, one of the difficult tasks is the verification of the produced numerical results. The present paper deals with the in-depth verification of a basic problem, referring to the axisymmetric loading by edge forces/moments of a spherical dome, truncated at various roll-down angles, φo. Two formulations of analytical solutions are derived by the bibliography; their results are compared with those produced by the implementation of the finite element method. Modelling details, such as the finite element type, orientation of joints, application of loading, boundary conditions, and results’ interpretation, are presented thoroughly. Four different ratios of the radius of curvature, r and shell’s thickness, and t are examined in order to investigate the compatibility between the implementation of the finite element method to the “first-order” shell theory. The discussion refers to the differences not only between the numerical and analytical results, but also between the two analytical approaches. Furthermore, it emphasizes the necessity of contacting even linear elastic preliminary verification numerical tests as a basis for the construction of more elaborated and sophisticated models.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.