2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-analytical computation of Laplacian Green functions in three-dimensional domains with disconnected spherical boundaries

Abstract: We apply the generalized method of separation of variables (GMSV) to solve boundary value problems for the Laplace operator in three-dimensional domains with disconnected spherical boundaries (i.e., an arbitrary configuration of non-overlapping partially reactive spherical sinks or obstacles). We consider both exterior and interior problems and all most common boundary conditions: Dirichlet, Neumann, Robin, and conjugate one. Using the translational addition theorems for solid harmonics to switch between the l… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
(121 reference statements)
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the proposed approach is not limited to the spherical boundary. For instance, the case of a hyperplane was partly studied in [34,101]; apart from straightforward extensions to disks and cylinders, one can consider more complicated catalytic surfaces formed by multiple non-overlapping spheres, for which the Dirichlet propagator in the steadystate regime was recently investigated in [26]. In general, the eigenbasis of the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator M p can be constructed numerically; since M p is independent of the surface reactivity, this construction has to be performed only once for a given catalytic surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the proposed approach is not limited to the spherical boundary. For instance, the case of a hyperplane was partly studied in [34,101]; apart from straightforward extensions to disks and cylinders, one can consider more complicated catalytic surfaces formed by multiple non-overlapping spheres, for which the Dirichlet propagator in the steadystate regime was recently investigated in [26]. In general, the eigenbasis of the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator M p can be constructed numerically; since M p is independent of the surface reactivity, this construction has to be performed only once for a given catalytic surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reactivity is thus related to the probability of reaction event at the encounter [12][13][14]. Robin boundary condition with homogeneous (constant) reactivity κ was often employed to describe many chemical and biochemical reactions and permeation processes [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26], to model stochastic gating [27][28][29][30], or to approximate the effect of microscopic heterogeneities in a random distribution of reactive sites [31][32][33] (see a recent overview in [34]). In spite of its practical importance, diffusion-controlled reactions with heterogeneous surface reactivity κ(s) remain much less studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, when the starting point lies outside this solid angle (i.e. q e > ), the distance to the target is larger than q -R r H r p , , ; ( )should decay faster, the contributions in (C. 18) and (C. 19) are thus cancelled, and one needs more refined asymptotic analysis. Without dwelling further on this analysis, we present below probabilistic arguments to get a reasonable approximation.…”
Section: C2 Short-time Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, the intricate exploration of the partially reactive surface via diffusionmediated jumps in complicated structures such as multiscale porous media or domains with irregular or fractal boundaries, remains poorly understood. In this light, efficient numerical techniques such as fast Monte Carlo methods [82,67,68,83] or semi-analytical solutions [84,85] become particularly important.…”
Section: Conclusion: Is the Finite Reactivity Important?mentioning
confidence: 99%