2015
DOI: 10.3844/ajeassp.2015.620.632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi Active Tuned Mass Dampers of Buildings: A Simple Control Option

Abstract: Abstract:The present study investigates the effectiveness of a ProportionalIntegral-Derivative (PID) controlled Variable Damping Semi-Active Tuned Mass Damper (VD-STMD) on reducing the vibration response of an earthquake excited multi-storey structure. The effectiveness of the controlled system is evaluated by comparing the structure's overall dynamic behavior against that of an equivalent similar structure equipped with a conventional optimally designed passive Tuned Mass Damper (TMD). The numerical simulatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers are focusing on optimising the material efficiency of structures and structural systems [1][2][3][4][5] as well as on the performance of structures and buildings specifically to wind and seismic actions by minimising weight and control capacity [6][7][8][9][10][11], in order to avoid using redundant material, thus increasing the stiffness over weight ratio without compromising their capacity. However, the optimisation process can be time and resource intensive when it is done with traditional methods, thus in recent years advanced computational tools have been employed to carry out effective material distribution for structures, such as the shape and topology optimisation techniques [12][13][14][15], technologies previously used in aeronautical and automotive engineering where material savings is of ultimate importance for the performance of the shuttle and vehicles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers are focusing on optimising the material efficiency of structures and structural systems [1][2][3][4][5] as well as on the performance of structures and buildings specifically to wind and seismic actions by minimising weight and control capacity [6][7][8][9][10][11], in order to avoid using redundant material, thus increasing the stiffness over weight ratio without compromising their capacity. However, the optimisation process can be time and resource intensive when it is done with traditional methods, thus in recent years advanced computational tools have been employed to carry out effective material distribution for structures, such as the shape and topology optimisation techniques [12][13][14][15], technologies previously used in aeronautical and automotive engineering where material savings is of ultimate importance for the performance of the shuttle and vehicles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of civil engineering vibration control, passive control [19][20][21][22], semi-active control [23][24][25], active control [26][27][28], and hybrid control [29][30][31][32] have been extensively studied and demonstrated. In particular, passive control is the most widely used type of control system due to its simple structure, easy maintenance and high reliability [33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, unlike the ATMDs, they can operate with minimal power requirement (Hrovat, Barak, & Rabins, 1983;Kang, Kim, & Lee, 2011;Varadarajan & Nagarajaiah, 2004). Owing to these advantages and the practical demand, the SATMDs are gaining more popularity and attention for conducting research in various application areas (Bathaei, Zahrai, & Ramezani, 2017;Chung, Lai, Yang, Lian, & Wu, 2013;Demetriou & Nikitas, 2016;Demetriou, Nikitas, & Tsavdaridis, 2015;Demetriou et al, 2015;Gao, Xiang, Liu, & Zhou, 2018;Zemp, de la Llera, & Almazan, 2011). Numerous algorithms have been proposed by different researchers for applications on structures fitted with SATMDs (Abe, 1996;Cha & Agrawal, 2010;Gutierrez Soto & Adeli, 2017;Kang et al, 2011;Nagarajaiah & Sonmez, 2007;Pinkaew & Fujino, 2001;Ricciardelli, Occhiuzzi, & Clemente, 2000;Runlin, Xiyuan, & Xihui, 2002;Setareh, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%