2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2009.02696
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SemEval-2020 Task 11: Detection of Propaganda Techniques in News Articles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We analyse the results of two datasets in our approach, a collection of unlabelled articles from RT and the SemEval-2020 Task 11 dataset, curated by Martino et al [2], which is labelled according to the techniques they define in their other paper [1]. Due to the token restrictions imposed by the OpenAI API for the model we use, both datasets are filtered to ensure that no article exceeds 3000 characters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We analyse the results of two datasets in our approach, a collection of unlabelled articles from RT and the SemEval-2020 Task 11 dataset, curated by Martino et al [2], which is labelled according to the techniques they define in their other paper [1]. Due to the token restrictions imposed by the OpenAI API for the model we use, both datasets are filtered to ensure that no article exceeds 3000 characters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Span Identification) -tikslas yra tekste atpažinti konkrečius propagandos fragmentus; antrojo uždavinio -Technikos Klasifikacijos (angl. Technique Classification) -tikslas -teksto fragmentui, kuris yra nustatytas kaip propagandinis, priskirti jame naudojamas technikas iš propagandos technikų sąrašo [3]. Šiame darbe išbandomi 3 pagrindiniai transformeriais pagrįsti, iš anksto apmokyti daugiakalbiai modeliai, apmokyti ir lietuvių kalba, sprendžiant paprastesnį, binarinį propagandos klasifikavimo uždavinį.…”
Section: įVadasunclassified
“…The next iteration of the workshop, SemEval-2020 Task 11 [12], revised the FLC task by breaking it down into span identification and a revised 14-way propaganda technique classification. The top performing teams had an F1 of 51.55 for span identification and 62.07 for propaganda technique classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%