2015
DOI: 10.18805/ijar.7494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semen quality and fertility of Bama miniature pig (Sus scrofa domestica)

Abstract: Semen quality and fertility of Bama miniature pig and the effect of season on these parameters were determined in this study. Results were as follows: the overall mean ejaculate volume, 55.71 ± 15.21 ml; sperm concentration, 0.66 ± 0.22 × 108/ml; sperm motility, 65.39% ± 16.45%; abnormal sperm percentage, 12.16% ± 7.70%; farrowing rate, 76.44%; litter size, 7.74 ± 2.46. It showed that the semen quality and fertility of Bama miniature pigs were lower than the normal level of the larger commercial and local bree… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

6
13
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The P wave was positive in the DII derivation in all animals, ranging from 39.2 to 42.75 ms in duration. These findings were similar to those observed in conventional minipigs and pigs which was within the range considered normal [10,32]. The PR interval ranged from 114 to 119.12 ms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The P wave was positive in the DII derivation in all animals, ranging from 39.2 to 42.75 ms in duration. These findings were similar to those observed in conventional minipigs and pigs which was within the range considered normal [10,32]. The PR interval ranged from 114 to 119.12 ms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The HR values found in this study were similar to the findings for pigs (Sus scrofa domestica), guinea pigs and peccaries [3,32,33]. Although they belong to different families, domestic pigs and peccaries are physically similar [4], justifying the similarity in HR values among these species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations