2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.05.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semen Parameters and Sperm DNA Fragmentation as Causes of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
65
0
8

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
9
65
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Using sperm chromatin dispersion test (SCD), Bellver et al [3] observed that sperm DNA fragmentation was higher in the recurrent spontaneous abortion group compared with the sperm donor group. Moreover, Brahem et al [7] also indicated that sperm from men with a history of RPL had a higher incidence of DNA damage and poor motility than sperm from a control group. From large animal and human studies, Evenson and colleagues, who first described SCSA, suggested that threshold of 0-15 %.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using sperm chromatin dispersion test (SCD), Bellver et al [3] observed that sperm DNA fragmentation was higher in the recurrent spontaneous abortion group compared with the sperm donor group. Moreover, Brahem et al [7] also indicated that sperm from men with a history of RPL had a higher incidence of DNA damage and poor motility than sperm from a control group. From large animal and human studies, Evenson and colleagues, who first described SCSA, suggested that threshold of 0-15 %.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available evidence suggests that, although spermatozoa prepared using standard routine sperm preparation methods such as DDGC or swim-up may have generally lower levels of DNA fragmentation or compromised chromatin compared with spermatozoa from unprocessed semen samples, and may therefore be suitable for use in assisted reproduction techniques, such preparations may not exclude sperm that are compromised in these regards (Zini et al, 1999;Brahem et al, 2011b;Henkel, 2012;Mortimer and Mortimer, 2013). This is a particular issue for ICSI in which sperm selection relies almost exclusively on the embryologist's judgement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of classical parameters such as concentration, viability, motility and morphology under WHO guidelines, these techniques do enrich for more fertile spermatozoa (WHO, 2010). Functional properties of DDGCenriched populations, such as DNA integrity and chromatin maturity that could explain the improved fertility of these populations of spermatozoa, are, however, usually not assessed.Available evidence suggests that, although spermatozoa prepared using standard routine sperm preparation methods such as DDGC or swim-up may have generally lower levels of DNA fragmentation or compromised chromatin compared with spermatozoa from unprocessed semen samples, and may therefore be suitable for use in assisted reproduction techniques, such preparations may not exclude sperm that are compromised in these regards (Zini et al, 1999;Brahem et al, 2011b;Henkel, 2012;Mortimer and Mortimer, 2013). This is a particular issue for ICSI in which sperm selection relies almost exclusively on the embryologist's judgement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Репродуктивные потери нации на сегодняшний день являются важной медико-социальной проблемой и определяют повышенный интерес многих исследо-вателей к состоянию фертильного потенциала [1][2][3][4][5]. В России процент бесплодного брака достаточно высок и колеблется от 10 до 15 % всех супружеских пар [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified