1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0093-691x(88)80003-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semen characteristics of the guinea fowl Numida meleagris meleagris

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In birds, sexual behaviour and semen quality are parameters limiting male reproductive efficiency, as they can have a profound effect on fertility (Sexton, 1983;Saeid and Al-Soudi, 1975;Cheng et al, 2002;Nwakalor et al, 1988). Seasonal changes in sperm numbers, motility, viability and morphology have been reported in several farmed bird species (Shikabrown chicken: Obidi et al, 2008;duck: Penfold et al, 2000;emu: Malecki et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In birds, sexual behaviour and semen quality are parameters limiting male reproductive efficiency, as they can have a profound effect on fertility (Sexton, 1983;Saeid and Al-Soudi, 1975;Cheng et al, 2002;Nwakalor et al, 1988). Seasonal changes in sperm numbers, motility, viability and morphology have been reported in several farmed bird species (Shikabrown chicken: Obidi et al, 2008;duck: Penfold et al, 2000;emu: Malecki et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most tail defects involved bending or coiling in all regions of the tail (including the endpiece) although this phenomenon was particularly obvious in the principal piece where it accounted for 52% of total defects. Tail bending has not been described in the emu (Du Plessis and Soley, 2011a) although it has been reported in a number of birds (Ferdinand, 1992;Nwakalor et al, 1988;Omeje and Marire, 1990;Penfold et al, 2000;Sontakke et al, 2004;Umapathy et al, 2005) with a variable incidence. Why tail bending should be so prevalent in the ostrich and relatively scarce in the emu, another commercially exploited ratite, remains enigmatic but may be related to the greater incidence of retained cytoplasmic droplets and residual cytoplasmic material associated with ostrich sperm (see below).…”
Section: Tail Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although macrocephalic heads also formed a large proportion of total head defects in the emu (18.3%), bent heads, acephalic sperm and round heads collectively contributed to the greater proportion of head defects prevalent in the emu compared to the ostrich. Macrocephalic sperm are commonly found in small numbers in other avian species, such as the guinea fowl (Nwakalor et al, 1988), turkey (Lindsay et al, 1999), pigeon (Klimowicz et al, 2005) and quail (Chelmońska et al, 2008). High numbers of macrocephalic sperm (5-40%) have been reported in the Houbara bustard without any apparent influence on fertility (Lindsay et al, 1999).…”
Section: Head Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most classification systems on avian sperm defects fail to reflect multior biflagellate sperm [32][33][34][35][36]. However, this anomaly has been mentioned [37][38][39], briefly described and/or illustrated in some avian species such as the Houbara bustard [40], goose [41][42][43], duck [44], guinea fowl [45] and, more recently, in the emu [9]. With the exception of a detailed study on the ultrastructure of multiple sperm tails in the drake [44], the morphological features of this defect are poorly understood in birds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%