Semantically Far Inspirations Considered Harmful?

Abstract

Collaborative ideation systems can help people generate more creative ideas by exposing them to ideas different from their own. However, there are competing theoretical views on whether and when such exposure is helpful. Associationist theory suggests that exposing ideators to ideas that are semantically far from their own maximizes novel combinations of ideas. In contrast, SIAM theory cautions that systems should offer far ideas only when ideators reach an impasse (a cognitive state in which they have exhausted ideas within a particular category), and offer near ideas during productive ideation (a cognitive state in which they are actively exploring ideas within a category), which maximizes exploration within categories. Our research compares these theoretical recommendations.In an online experiment, 245 participants generated ideas for a themed wedding; we detected and validated participants' cognitive states using a combination of behavioral and neuroimaging data. Receiving far ideas during productive ideation resulted in slower ideation and less within-category exploration, without significant benefits for novelty, compared to receiving no inspirations. Participants were also more likely to hit an impasse when receiving far ideas during productive ideation. These findings suggest that far inspirational ideas can harm creativity if received during productive ideation.

Evaluating the Use of Digital Creativity Support by Journalists in Newsrooms

“…Bespoke digital creativity support tools have also been developed to support early collaborative design tasks (e.g. [4,11,20,37]). Studies have also investigated how existing technologies such as social media platforms afforded collaborative creativity in creative domains [14,24].…”

Advancing GUI for Generative AI: Charting the Design Space of Human-AI Interactions through Task Creativity and Complexity

“…These include tasks such as crafting analogous design concepts [18,31], design problems [20][21][22], slogans [8], and tweetorials [15]. LLMs like GPT can foster novel connections or "creative leaps" due to their extensive knowledge base [4]. However, real creativity often requires domain-specific and nuanced knowledge that might be absent in LLM training data.…”