2008
DOI: 10.1049/iet-sen:20070109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic software metrics computed from natural language design specifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Decomposition by objects has been shown to produce better systems [Meyer 1997], with nouns often indicating objects in a software system. This has led to further research in understanding systems through the use of natural language analysis [Witte et al 2008;Gall et al 2008;Fry et al 2008]. Chasm relies on the natural ability of practitioners to use loaded terms, nouns and verbs, to express ideas.…”
Section: External Concept Tiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decomposition by objects has been shown to produce better systems [Meyer 1997], with nouns often indicating objects in a software system. This has led to further research in understanding systems through the use of natural language analysis [Witte et al 2008;Gall et al 2008;Fry et al 2008]. Chasm relies on the natural ability of practitioners to use loaded terms, nouns and verbs, to express ideas.…”
Section: External Concept Tiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further series of tools, such as JDiff [52,53] and UMLDiff [54] are more aware of the semantic consequences of change in object-oriented (OO) environments like Java and can make more human-meaningful comparisons as a result. Tools for model differencing [55,56] and semantic distances [57] are also relevant here.…”
Section: Edit Distances and Beyondmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Limited or no access to the component's source code. Many proposals have imposed suitable information (metadata) on the component [7], [33], [57], [58]. • Even if a component provider offers the source of the component, the component user may use a different development language [59].…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%