Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on World Wide Web - WWW '03 2003
DOI: 10.1145/775248.775250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic search

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
251
0
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(258 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
251
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…It uses IR engine to index the crawled semantic web documents using either n-gram or URIrefs as terms and computes a ranked list of these documents given the search terms. [1] augments keyword search with semantic information collected from different sources while [2] uses keyword search results as a seed to do spread activation on semantic networks. These work takes a pure IR approach and does not support structured queries on the semantic web data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It uses IR engine to index the crawled semantic web documents using either n-gram or URIrefs as terms and computes a ranked list of these documents given the search terms. [1] augments keyword search with semantic information collected from different sources while [2] uses keyword search results as a seed to do spread activation on semantic networks. These work takes a pure IR approach and does not support structured queries on the semantic web data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are testing our techniques on a corpus of documents from the CNN web site, 5 comprising 145,316 documents (445 MB). The domain ontology KB was taken from the KIM Platform [8], developed by Ontotext Lab, 6 with minor adjustments, plus the…”
Section: Early Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ontologies achieve a reduction of ambiguity, and bring powerful inferencing schemes for reasoning and querying. Not surprisingly, there is a growing body of literature in the last few years that studies the use of ontologies to improve the effectiveness of information retrieval [5,8,10,11] and personalized search [4]. In this paper, we present a comprehensive personalized retrieval framework where the advantages of ontologies are exploited in different parts of the retrieval cycle: query-based relevance measures, semantic user preference representation, automatic preference update, and personalized result ranking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [4], a decomposition of PageRank to basic components is suggested that may be able to scale the different PageRank computations to a bigger number of topics or even distinct users. Another approach to web search is presented in [2], where a rich extension of the web, called semantic web, and the application of searching over this new setting is described.In this work we depart from the above lines of research and propose a new conceptual framework for representing the web and potentially improving search results. In particular, the new framework views the web as a collection of webrelated data collected and semi-organized by individual users inside their information spaces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [4], a decomposition of PageRank to basic components is suggested that may be able to scale the different PageRank computations to a bigger number of topics or even distinct users. Another approach to web search is presented in [2], where a rich extension of the web, called semantic web, and the application of searching over this new setting is described.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%