2010
DOI: 10.1108/14684521011073025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic representation for copyright metadata of user‐generated content in folksonomies

Abstract: Purpose-The purpose of this research is to investigate some general features of folksonomies and user-generated content with copyright issues, and to present semantic representation for folksonomies using a tag ontology that can be used to represent tagging data at a semantic level using Semantic Web technologies. Design/methodology/approach-An exploratory study is described that features current social tagging methods and copyright metadata. In particular, a tag ontology is extended for representing copyright… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main tangible product of collaborative tagging is a social classification system called “folksonomy”, which is a conflation of the worlds “folk” and “taxonomy” [21]. Folksonomies represent non-hierarchical groups of terms that describe and organize Web resources for future retrieval, discovery, or sharing purposes [22]. Folksonomies offer great features, including their low cost, ease of use, and the reflection of users’ vocabulary [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main tangible product of collaborative tagging is a social classification system called “folksonomy”, which is a conflation of the worlds “folk” and “taxonomy” [21]. Folksonomies represent non-hierarchical groups of terms that describe and organize Web resources for future retrieval, discovery, or sharing purposes [22]. Folksonomies offer great features, including their low cost, ease of use, and the reflection of users’ vocabulary [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%