Proceedings of the EMNLP 2014 Workshop on Arabic Natural Language Processing (ANLP) 2014
DOI: 10.3115/v1/w14-3611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic Query Expansion for Arabic Information Retrieval

Abstract: Traditional keyword based search is found to have some limitations. Such as word sense ambiguity, and the query intent ambiguity which can hurt the precision. Semantic search uses the contextual meaning of terms in addition to the semantic matching techniques in order to overcome these limitations. This paper introduces a query expansion approach using an ontology built from Wikipedia pages in addition to other thesaurus to improve search accuracy for Arabic language. Our approach outperformed the traditional … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the studies that addressed the support of Arabic language on the SW can be divided into four categories [7]: 1) the development of Arabic ontologies [18,20,21], 2) Employing ontologies to improve Arabic named entities extraction [4,36], 3) Ontology based representation of Islamic knowledge [2,19,24] and 4) supporting cross-language information retrieval and search [17,33]. Although an increasing number of efforts have started to use ontologies to enhance information retrieval from Arabic data [29,31], the use of ontologies was almost limited to query expansion, and results were retrieved from unstructured data on the Web. Our work takes a different direction by addressing NL interfaces for querying ontologies and RDF stores.…”
Section: Support For Arabic Language On the Swmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the studies that addressed the support of Arabic language on the SW can be divided into four categories [7]: 1) the development of Arabic ontologies [18,20,21], 2) Employing ontologies to improve Arabic named entities extraction [4,36], 3) Ontology based representation of Islamic knowledge [2,19,24] and 4) supporting cross-language information retrieval and search [17,33]. Although an increasing number of efforts have started to use ontologies to enhance information retrieval from Arabic data [29,31], the use of ontologies was almost limited to query expansion, and results were retrieved from unstructured data on the Web. Our work takes a different direction by addressing NL interfaces for querying ontologies and RDF stores.…”
Section: Support For Arabic Language On the Swmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wikipedia-based categories have been also exploited to improve the categorization of Arabic text [32]. Some works have also used Arabic Wikipedia as background knowledge to expand queries submitted to search engines or question answering systems [33]. The work in this paper adds to previous knowledge by extending the use of Arabic Wikipedia to include the entity-linking problem.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Here, we propose using the Arabic vectors as a semantic expansion technique because the Arabic vectors capture the semantic properties of the language such that semantically close terms are clustered in close proximity in the vector space. Mahgoub et al [ 23] proposed query semantic expansion techniques for Arabic information retrieval, the expansion techniques based on various language resources as Wikipedia, Google translate with WordNet, and other various Arabic linguistic resources. We compare our vector expansion technique with their techniques using TREC 2002 the cross-lingual (CLIR) track dataset [ 24], which contains 50 queries tested against 383,872 documents, we discarded any non-judged documents from our experiments before evaluation.…”
Section: Information Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to avoid bias in reordering the expansion list, the term being expanded is not included among the terms forming the query vector. For each query, we allow maximum 50 expansions for all of its terms, such that the number of expansions for each term is inversely proportional to its frequency, thus allowing less frequent terms to have more expansions [ 23]. Figure 1 and 2 compare between the impact of using the Arabic vectors as an expansion scheme versus traditional resources as Wikipedia, WordNet translations and other resources using Indiri [ 25].…”
Section: Information Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%