2015
DOI: 10.1162/tacl_a_00152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic Proto-Roles

Abstract: We present the first large-scale, corpus based verification of Dowty’s seminal theory of proto-roles. Our results demonstrate both the need for and the feasibility of a property-based annotation scheme of semantic relationships, as opposed to the currently dominant notion of categorical roles.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
69
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our work instead grounds into a fixed set of attributes but leverages language on a broader scale to learn about more verbs in more diverse set of frames. In this, our work can be seen as exploring predicate lexical semantics in the vein of semantic proto-roles (Dowty, 1991;Kako, 2006;Reisinger et al, 2015), but instead affording pairwise, physical relations between roles .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work instead grounds into a fixed set of attributes but leverages language on a broader scale to learn about more verbs in more diverse set of frames. In this, our work can be seen as exploring predicate lexical semantics in the vein of semantic proto-roles (Dowty, 1991;Kako, 2006;Reisinger et al, 2015), but instead affording pairwise, physical relations between roles .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This choice of axes is aimed at allowing our framework to capture not only the standard EPISODIC-HABITUAL-GENERIC distinction, but also phenomena that do not fit neatly into this distinction, such as taxonomic reference, abstract reference, and weak definites. The idea here is similar to prior decompositional semantics work on semantic protoroles (Reisinger et al, 2015;White et al, 2016White et al, , 2017, which associates categories like AGENT or PATIENT with sets of more basic properties, such as volitionality, causation, change-of-state, etc., and is similarly inspired by classic theoretical work (Dowty, 1991).…”
Section: Annotation Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…To remedy this, we propose a novel framework for capturing linguistic expressions of generalization. Taking inspiration from decompositional semantics (Reisinger et al, 2015;White et al, 2016), we suggest that linguistic expressions of generalization should be captured in a continuous multilabel system, rather than a multi-class system. We do this by decomposing categories such as EPISODIC, HABITUAL, and GENERIC into simple referential properties of predicates and their arguments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various features in addition to the embeddings of verbs and prepositions were also tested. The features we experimented with include semantic protorole property scores (Reisinger et al 2015) of the target PP (normalized mean across 5 annotators), mutual information (MI) (Aldezabal et al 2002), word embeddings of the nominal head token of the NP under the PP in question, existence of a direct object, and various interaction terms between the features (e.g., additive, subtractive, inner/outer products).…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%