2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic priming modulates the N400, N300, and N400RP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
79
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
8
79
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors found a significant activation in the right posterior cingulated, with related prime pairs as compared to unrelated prime pairs. This data replicated a previous event-related potentials (ERP) study 28 which observed a word N300 in a word similar experiment.…”
Section: Neural Correlates Of Lexical-semantic Processing and The Semsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The authors found a significant activation in the right posterior cingulated, with related prime pairs as compared to unrelated prime pairs. This data replicated a previous event-related potentials (ERP) study 28 which observed a word N300 in a word similar experiment.…”
Section: Neural Correlates Of Lexical-semantic Processing and The Semsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In contrast, we predicted that these effects would be relatively unaffected by SOA, as suggested by a number of studies using no repetition (Boddy, 1986;Hill et al, 2002;Franklin et al, 2007). Finally, rather than meaning dimension (i.e., categorical relations vs. associative relations), we hypothesized that task instruction would be critical for the preservation of semantic priming effects with repetition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…N400 effects of priming consists in reduced N400 amplitudes for primed or congruous words compared to unprimed or incongruous words in sentence Hillyard, 1980, 1984) or prime-target (Bentin et al, 1985) contexts. These effects were observed in tasks involving all mentioned semantic relations, namely category (e.g., Heinze et al, 1998), functional (Bach et al, 2009), synonymy (Liu et al, 2003), antonymy (Kutas and Iragui, 1998), schema (Chwilla and Kolk, 2005), or world knowledge (Hagoort et al, 2004) but also associative relations (Franklin et al, 2007). These findings thus indicate a systematic sensitivity of the N400 component to the processing of meaning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…In the behavioural priming literature, three different priming mechanisms have been proposed [2,5]: (1) Automatic spreading of activation (ASA) was the first such proposal [6] and assumes that semantically related 'word nodes' in long-term memory (LTM) are linked, such that activation of one node (e.g., doctor) spreads to related nodes (e.g., nurse) and pre-activates them, thereby facilitating subsequent lexical access. Given that ASA is viewed as fast, automatic and passive, semantic priming due to ASA is taken as mandatory at least at short stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) of less than 300 ms between prime and target, but it also seems to play a role at longer SOAs.…”
Section: Priming Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%