1994
DOI: 10.2307/1423039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic Priming in a Single-Word Shadowing Task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, consistent data from this task could provide further support for the sentence-gating method. The agent-naming task utilized here is a variant of the word-naming or shadowing/repetition task used by MarslenWilson (1985), and more recently by Liu et al (in press) and Slowiaczek (1994). In the single-word shadowing task used by Liu et aI., listeners were required to repeat the target word embedded in a sentence as soon as possible, and the target word was pronounced by a voice ofthe opposite sex from that in which the sentence had been pronounced.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, consistent data from this task could provide further support for the sentence-gating method. The agent-naming task utilized here is a variant of the word-naming or shadowing/repetition task used by MarslenWilson (1985), and more recently by Liu et al (in press) and Slowiaczek (1994). In the single-word shadowing task used by Liu et aI., listeners were required to repeat the target word embedded in a sentence as soon as possible, and the target word was pronounced by a voice ofthe opposite sex from that in which the sentence had been pronounced.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sentence materials were presented either successively (Experiment 1; see also P. Li, 1994) or individually (Experiment 2). The third was an agent-naming experiment, adapted from the word-shadowing paradigm (Liu, Bates, Powell, & Wulfeck, in press;Marslen-Wilson, 1985;Slowiaczek, 1994). Consistent results from these different paradigms, I reasoned, will lead to converging evidence, while inconsistent results may reflect effects specific to a particular paradigm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, similar arguments to those levelled at verification procedures in the single-word semantic priming literature (i.e., lexical decision tasks) can be made with regard to those employed in studying simple arithmetic. Specifically, it has been suggested that 'attentional' decision processes, that occur after the simple matching of a stimulus with its lexical representation, may confound the overall reaction time measured in the lexical decision task Friedrich, Henik & Tzelgov, 1991;Lorch, Balota & Stamm, 1986;Neely, 1991;Sereno, 1991;Slowiaczek, 1994;Smith, Besner & Myoshi, 1994). In the case of the aforementioned studies then, it could be argued that the requirement to actively make a binary decision as to the relationship between the prime and the target might interfere with the automatic processes, essentially thought to occur without intention or awareness, that they purport to measure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NURSE), the so-called semantic priming effect has been extensively replicated in written word recognition, especially for associatively related pairs (Lupker, 1984;Neely, 1990). It was later demonstrated between spoken words, using the lexical decision task (Radeau, 1983) and single word shadowing (Slowiaczek, 1994), and was shown to occur across sensory modalities, for example, between an auditory prime and a visual target (Swinney et al, 1979).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%