2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic priming and neurobiology in schizophrenia: A theoretical review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 322 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding more recent findings, a current review reported heterogeneous results ( Almeida and Radanovic, 2021 ): Hyperpriming, described by the majority of studies and associated with positive FTD (e.g., Safadi et al, 2013 ; Kuperberg et al, 2019 ), was repeatedly reported ( Almeida and Radanovic, 2021 ), whereas other studies found persistent (i.e., beyond the acute phase of illness; Besche-Richard et al, 2014 ) hypopriming (e.g., Niznikiewicz et al, 2010 ; Sass et al, 2014 ; Tan et al, 2015 ). Furthermore, the typicality effect (i.e., faster response to typical than to atypical words) was found to be reduced during the initial episode of schizophrenia spectrum disorder (but not during stabilization) and correlated with negative symptoms ( Hui et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Current Clinical Findingsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding more recent findings, a current review reported heterogeneous results ( Almeida and Radanovic, 2021 ): Hyperpriming, described by the majority of studies and associated with positive FTD (e.g., Safadi et al, 2013 ; Kuperberg et al, 2019 ), was repeatedly reported ( Almeida and Radanovic, 2021 ), whereas other studies found persistent (i.e., beyond the acute phase of illness; Besche-Richard et al, 2014 ) hypopriming (e.g., Niznikiewicz et al, 2010 ; Sass et al, 2014 ; Tan et al, 2015 ). Furthermore, the typicality effect (i.e., faster response to typical than to atypical words) was found to be reduced during the initial episode of schizophrenia spectrum disorder (but not during stabilization) and correlated with negative symptoms ( Hui et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Current Clinical Findingsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Also with regard to N400 findings, review papers pointed to incongruent study results ( Kuperberg et al, 2010 ; Mohammad and DeLisi, 2013 ) without a clear correlation between specific N400 patterns and FTD measures ( Almeida and Radanovic, 2021 ). Here, persons with schizophrenia predominantly showed a reduced N400 effect (e.g., Laurent et al, 2010 ; Mathalon et al, 2010 ; Niznikiewicz et al, 2010 ; Kiang et al, 2014 ; meta-analysis see Wang et al, 2011 ; review see Almeida and Radanovic, 2021 ), which has been described as “normalized” after the acute phase of disease ( Besche-Richard et al, 2014 ). A modulation by the SOA seems to be important here.…”
Section: Current Clinical Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time taken to make the lexical decision, or reaction time (RT), is shorter for target words preceded by such related words 52 . In people with schizophrenia attributes (SzAs, i.e., schizophrenia patients and subclinical people with schizotypal traits), this RT priming is smaller than in healthy controls with low schizotypal traits when the time between the onset of the priming word and that of the string of letter is longer than 500 ms 53 . On the other hand, the N400 event-related brain potential (ERP) has also been found to depend on semantic priming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The spreading activation model has been influential in linguistic and behavioral cognitive research 12 . With a few exceptions pertaining to neurotransmitter levels modulating the amount of spreading activation 13 , 14 , the precise biological implementation and plausibility of the spreading activation model have not been sufficiently addressed. Furthermore, the spreading activation model does not explain how NA on meso- and macroscopic measures of brain activity emerges from activity patterns in populations of single neurons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%