Two experiments tested subjects' acquisition of the information found in newspaper stories. Subjects studied either an actual newspaper story or an altered form of the story constructed by deleting the irrelevant and redundant information and restructuring the remaining information into either a narrative, topical, or outline form. Subjects who studied the intact newspaper story learned little of the irrelevant and redundant information compared to the other information in the story. Presentation of any of the condensed versions of the story led to better recall than presentation of the entire news story. However, none of the structural reorganizations of the text information led to consistently superior recall relative to a passage that deleted the irrelevant information but maintained the news story structure. These results suggest that people may select among several alternative structural schemata for the representation of narrative passages in memory.The influence of text organizations on the acquisition of information from texts has received extensive treatment by educational and cognitive psychologists. Several studies have investigated the efficacy of various information organizations for learning. In a series of related studies (Frase, text passages were constructed from matrices of name-attribute-value triples. That is, a set of concepts in a semantic category was described using a fixed set of attributes, and each concept in the category had different values of the attribute. In general, these studies demonstrated that coherent organizations of the information (i.e., either by names or by attributes) produced better learning than did a random organization and that the two organizations produced equivalent levels of learning and better learning than a random organization. While name organization was a preferred or dominant learning strategy, attribute organization could be adopted if the to-be-learned texts were so structured.