2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-34234-9_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic Models for Architectural Heritage Documentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thematic views and analyses are also possible, but for this matter, an ADE (application domain extension) is needed to be developed for CityGML [195]. In [198], an ADE is proposed for CityGML by extending it through XML that is capable of modeling thematic information of parts of architectural heritage buildings in multilevel views from LoD (Level of Detail) 1 to LoD 5 increasing details of parts and related information. In [198], another ADE is developed for CityGML called CHADE (Cultural Heritage Application Domain Extension).…”
Section: ) Spatio-temporal Aspect Of Ch Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thematic views and analyses are also possible, but for this matter, an ADE (application domain extension) is needed to be developed for CityGML [195]. In [198], an ADE is proposed for CityGML by extending it through XML that is capable of modeling thematic information of parts of architectural heritage buildings in multilevel views from LoD (Level of Detail) 1 to LoD 5 increasing details of parts and related information. In [198], another ADE is developed for CityGML called CHADE (Cultural Heritage Application Domain Extension).…”
Section: ) Spatio-temporal Aspect Of Ch Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [198], an ADE is proposed for CityGML by extending it through XML that is capable of modeling thematic information of parts of architectural heritage buildings in multilevel views from LoD (Level of Detail) 1 to LoD 5 increasing details of parts and related information. In [198], another ADE is developed for CityGML called CHADE (Cultural Heritage Application Domain Extension). In this spatial ontology, some classes are proposed for CityGML and incorporated Getty's AAT (Art and Architecture Thesaurus) vocabulary, so that the model is capable of providing geometric measurements also thematic information representation in different levels of detail.…”
Section: ) Spatio-temporal Aspect Of Ch Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formalization of knowledge in this information structure (within those domains and their sub-domains) allows an effective representation, making it accessible, editable and manageable by all the different actors involved in the conservation process. Moreover, it makes historical contents and critical interpretations computable, which have rarely been managed before through computation [17][18][19]. To achieve an exhaustive description of architectural heritage, the representation has to be articulated within the four domains.…”
Section: An Ontological Model For the Representation Of Architectural Heritagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, there have already been some previous researches which have proposed extensions to the cartographic standards here considered. In particular, two studies for extending CityGML (Costamagna, Spanò 2012, Noardo 2017 and another one extending the INSPIRE data model (Fernàndez-Freire et al, 2013); when possible they have been taken into account for the development of the EID. The ResCult data model, as INSPIRE extension, in a nutshell consists of mutual connections among the three topic themes ("Buildings" as INSPIRE Object, "Protected Site" and "Natural Risk Zone") each of them conveyor of semantic and geometric contents compliant to the several existing standards ( Figure 10).…”
Section: The Extension Of the Inspire Data Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%