1979
DOI: 10.3765/bls.v5i0.2164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic Mechanisms of Humor

Abstract: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (1979), pp. 325-335

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
180
0
63

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 381 publications
(245 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
180
0
63
Order By: Relevance
“…Child lore can also be adequately researched in light of the General Theory of Verbal Humour (GTVH) of Salvatore Attardo and Victor Raskin (1991), which generally lies in the hierarchic representation model of six knowledge resources. In brief, the levels of knowledge resources are: 1) script opposition (SO), which was taken over from Raskin's (1985) earlier semantic theory of humour and which states that a joke must be compatible with two different scripts and these in turn must be in opposition to each other to a certain extent; 2) logical mechanism (LM), which when breached causes discrepancies and false analogies that evoke humour; 3) situation (SI), which forms the contextual foundation of the joke and includes activities, participants, objects, etc. ; 4) target (TA) or the butt of the joke; 5) narrative strategy (NS) or the genre in which the joke works (e.g.…”
Section: Aspects Of Humour Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Child lore can also be adequately researched in light of the General Theory of Verbal Humour (GTVH) of Salvatore Attardo and Victor Raskin (1991), which generally lies in the hierarchic representation model of six knowledge resources. In brief, the levels of knowledge resources are: 1) script opposition (SO), which was taken over from Raskin's (1985) earlier semantic theory of humour and which states that a joke must be compatible with two different scripts and these in turn must be in opposition to each other to a certain extent; 2) logical mechanism (LM), which when breached causes discrepancies and false analogies that evoke humour; 3) situation (SI), which forms the contextual foundation of the joke and includes activities, participants, objects, etc. ; 4) target (TA) or the butt of the joke; 5) narrative strategy (NS) or the genre in which the joke works (e.g.…”
Section: Aspects Of Humour Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…also Lecercle 1994: 111). No matter whether we invoke Koestlerian bisociation, a script-switch of Victor Raskin (1985;, or a semantic leap (frame-shifting) of Seana Coulson (2001), they are all strictly related to the emergence of enjoyment in young receivers of children's literature, who want to play and to be pleased. Also, children need not so much a release from everyday stress (like the adults do) but rather try at all costs to avoid boredom and quench their curiosity.…”
Section: Conclusion -Henri Bergson Revisitedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Humour is essentially a non-bona-fide mode of communication (Raskin 1985), or in different terms, a communication characterised as paratelic activity (Apter 1982;Martin 2010). This means that in order for a joke to become potentially funny for the audience, they have to play along and accept the situation both on the level of the specific joke and on the level of its social context.…”
Section: Failed Humour In Cmcmentioning
confidence: 99%