2007
DOI: 10.1613/jair.2153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic Matchmaking as Non-Monotonic Reasoning: A Description Logic Approach

Abstract: Matchmaking arises when supply and demand meet in an electronic marketplace, or when agents search for a web service to perform some task, or even when recruiting agencies match curricula and job profiles. In such open environments, the objective of a matchmaking process is to discover best available offers to a given request.We address the problem of matchmaking from a knowledge representation perspective, with a formalization based on Description Logics. We devise Concept Abduction and Concept Contraction as… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
86
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
86
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study differs from [19] in two important aspects. First, we use a different methodology: rather than developing a theoretical similarity model and then evaluating it, we first found out empirically users' similarity preferences and then modeled them.…”
Section: Logic-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study differs from [19] in two important aspects. First, we use a different methodology: rather than developing a theoretical similarity model and then evaluating it, we first found out empirically users' similarity preferences and then modeled them.…”
Section: Logic-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Our work is also related to non-monotonic service similarity of Di Noia et al [19], who found it to be more intuitive than text-based vector space model retrieval using an experimental evaluation of three test cases and 30 people. Our study differs from [19] in two important aspects.…”
Section: Logic-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where rankPotential (r, s) [5] is the semantic distance measuring the degree of correspondence between request r and point of interest annotation POI, computed solving the Concept Abduction Problem (CAP) [5]; rankPotential (s, ) is the maximum possible semantic distance w.r.t. axioms in the selected ontology.…”
Section: Graphical User Interface (Gui)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the formal semantics of such descriptions, an explanation of the matchmaking outcome is then provided to the user to foster further interaction. This is accomplished by using a lightweight version of non-standard inference algorithms, i.e., Concept Abduction, Concept Contraction and Bonuses Calculation [5,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the approach we propose here, non-monotonic inferences presented in [5] are exploited to retrieve suitable treatments for a given disease taking into account the case history of the patient. The system will calculate a score, based on the semantic compatibility between diseases affecting the patient and characteristics of available drugs, so allowing to: (i) find possible inconsistencies in a proposed therapy; (ii) arrange best treatment options in relevance order; (iii) explain the matchmaking outcomes in both cases.…”
Section: Inference Services For Decision Support In Healthcarementioning
confidence: 99%