2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01216-8_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic Match Consistency for Long-Term Visual Localization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
131
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
131
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter type of methods have recently been shown to not perform consistently better than image retrieval methods [76], i.e., approaches that approximate the pose of the query image by the pose of the most similar database image [3,38,87]. As such, state-of-the-art methods for long-term visual localization at scale either rely on local features for matching [28,71,78,83,85,86] or use image retrieval techniques [2-4, 63, 80, 87, 94].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter type of methods have recently been shown to not perform consistently better than image retrieval methods [76], i.e., approaches that approximate the pose of the query image by the pose of the most similar database image [3,38,87]. As such, state-of-the-art methods for long-term visual localization at scale either rely on local features for matching [28,71,78,83,85,86] or use image retrieval techniques [2-4, 63, 80, 87, 94].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IBL has witnessed tremendous advancement by means of deep learning [18,19] and image retrieval techniques [1,2,34]. However, structure-based IBL [6,21,23,31,37,38,41] by directly establishing 2D-3D matches between a query image and SfM models is still the most prevailing strategy. Recent state-of-the-art methods handle the match ambiguity under high-dimensional feature representation with semantic consistency [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In feature-wise filtering, we reformulate a traditional match scoring function [16] with a bilateral Hamming ratio test to better evaluate the distinctiveness of matches. In visibility-arXiv:1908.06141v1 [cs.CV] 16 Aug 2019 Method Feature Type Compactness Match Filtering Prior-free SR Feature-wise Visibility-wise Geometry-wise AS [31] SIFT Strict WPE [21] SIFT Relaxed CSL [37] SIFT Relaxed * CPV [41] SIFT Relaxed * Hyperpoints [29] SIFT Relaxed In RPE EGM [23] SIFT+Binary Relaxed TC [6] SIFT Relaxed SMC [38] SIFT Relaxed * Our method Binary Relaxed Before RPE Table 1: Comparison between our method and other structure-based IBL methods. * means that the vertical direction of camera is known in advance, SR represents Spatial Reconfiguration and RPE represents RANSAC-based Pose Estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations