2009
DOI: 10.1045/july2009-papatheodorou
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic Integration of Collection Description

Abstract: In this paper, we discuss the use of ontologies for data integration. We consider two different settings depending on the system architecture: central and peer-to-peer data integration. Within those settings, we discuss five different cases studies that illustrate the use of ontologies in metadata representation, in global conceptualization, in high-level querying, in declarative mediation, and in mapping support. Each case study is described in detail and accompanied by examples.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since, paths are mapped from the source to the destination model, these languages should adopt a path-oriented approach as those presented in [56,59] and in [60,61]. To provide feedback that will support all mapping stages, further studies are needed to discover more semantic and structural similarities/differences between the models regarding representations of more types of bibliographic materials and more bibliographic relationships.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since, paths are mapped from the source to the destination model, these languages should adopt a path-oriented approach as those presented in [56,59] and in [60,61]. To provide feedback that will support all mapping stages, further studies are needed to discover more semantic and structural similarities/differences between the models regarding representations of more types of bibliographic materials and more bibliographic relationships.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sukaupta patirtis leido įsitraukti į tarptautinius ir nacionalinius skaitmeninimo, skaitmeninio išsaugojimo ir skaitmeninės priežiūros specialistų kvalifikacijos tobulinimo projektus: ENRICH; Pasaulio skaitmeninė biblioteka (angl. World Digital Library -WDL); Virtualios elektroninio paveldo sistemos plėtra (VEPS), Virtuali istorinė Lietuva: LDK; DigitalPreservationEurope; DigCurV ir kitus 14 .…”
Section: įVadasunclassified
“…In earlier work we developed the basic strategy for a framework of rule categories and discussed some of the technical issues involved (Renear et al, 2008a). Although the potential of our approach has been noted by other metadata researchers (Greenberg, 2009; Lourdi et al, 2009), the preliminary example categories we offered cover at best only a small portion of the semantics of metadata in common use. Further analysis and an empirical examination of actual metadata assignments has led to a larger, more fine‐grained framework that better matches actual metadata semantics.…”
Section: The Cimr Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%