1990
DOI: 10.3109/02699209008985494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic iconicity in plural acquisition: Extending the argument to include normal children

Abstract: Suprasegmental marking of plural has been noted in language-and phonologically-impaired children. Additionally, such marking has been interpreted within the iconicity model of language acquisition. The purpose of this paper is to extend this model of iconic influences on plural acquisition to the normal population. An analysis of the convergence of phonological, morphological and semantic factors within plural acquisition reveals that normal children are confronted with the identical factors that resulted in s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These structures are often the focus of communication training, yet each requires accurate speech production by the child (e.g., the final "s" sound for plural, possessive, and third-person singular forms as well as for contracted versions of the copula and auxiliary). Clearly, training on morphological targets is less likely to succeed with a child who is unable to produce an accurate "s" (Camarata, 1990;Camarata & Erwin, 1988). In addition, studies of language acquisition and data from studies of mother-child interaction reveal that speech production skills systematically improve without extensive analogue practice; instead, mothers present accurate models of words and sentences (including accurate speech sound models) within natural conversational interactions (e.g., Cross, 1978;Malsheen, 1980).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These structures are often the focus of communication training, yet each requires accurate speech production by the child (e.g., the final "s" sound for plural, possessive, and third-person singular forms as well as for contracted versions of the copula and auxiliary). Clearly, training on morphological targets is less likely to succeed with a child who is unable to produce an accurate "s" (Camarata, 1990;Camarata & Erwin, 1988). In addition, studies of language acquisition and data from studies of mother-child interaction reveal that speech production skills systematically improve without extensive analogue practice; instead, mothers present accurate models of words and sentences (including accurate speech sound models) within natural conversational interactions (e.g., Cross, 1978;Malsheen, 1980).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%