The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic distance as a critical factor in icon design for in-car infotainment systems

Abstract: In-car infotainment systems require icons that enable fluent cognitive information processing and safe interaction while driving. An important issue is how to find an optimised set of icons for different functions in terms of semantic distance. In an optimised icon set, every icon needs to be semantically as close as possible to the function it visually represents and semantically as far as possible from the other functions represented concurrently. In three experiments (N = 21 each), semantic distances of 19 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This tool bar contained both navigation and information icons and some respondents could not distinguish between them. This appears to reinforce research [40], which suggests that icons need to maintain 'difference'. An icon needs to be clearly distinguished from other icons in the same tool bar and be close semantically to its own function while maintaining as great a semantic distance as possible from the other icons.…”
Section: Question 3 'Does Grouping Icons In Tool Bars Make Their Measupporting
confidence: 71%
“…This tool bar contained both navigation and information icons and some respondents could not distinguish between them. This appears to reinforce research [40], which suggests that icons need to maintain 'difference'. An icon needs to be clearly distinguished from other icons in the same tool bar and be close semantically to its own function while maintaining as great a semantic distance as possible from the other icons.…”
Section: Question 3 'Does Grouping Icons In Tool Bars Make Their Measupporting
confidence: 71%
“…A number of interaction studies have been conducted on infotainment systems. Various infotainment systems have been studied, such as touch buttons (Crundall et al, 2016;Feng et al, 2018;Kim et al, 2014;Suh & Ferris, 2019), overall user interface (UI) elements (Hua & Ng, 2010;Naujoks et al, 2019;Pankok & Kaber, 2018), icons/symbols (Silvennoinen et al, 2017), screen position (Kuiper et al, 2018), layout (Kim et al, 2015;Li, Chen et al, 2017), sound effects (Larsson & Niemand, 2015), gestures (Graichen et al, 2019;Parada-Loira et al, 2014), and modality (Gaffar & Kouchak, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, when designers create an icon, three icon characteristics need to be taken into consideration: visual complexity, concreteness, and semantic distance ( Garcia, Badre, & Stasko, 1994 ; McDougall, Curry, & de Bruijin, 1999 ; Silvennoinen, Kujala, & Jokinen, 2017 ). To date, numerous studies investigated the effects of these icon characteristics on visual search performance: people responded more quickly and more accurately to simple icons than complex icons ( McDougall, de Bruijin, & Curry, 2000 ), users were more efficient at understanding concrete icons compared with abstract icons ( Rogers & Oborne, 1987 ; Stammers & Hoffman, 1991 ), and icons with close semantic distance were easier to identify ( Goonetilleke, Shih, On, & Fritsch, 2001 ; McDougall, Curry, & de Bruijin, 2001 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%