2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic compensation and novel word learning in university students with dyslexia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
2
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another important EEG marker for word processing is N400; this is the negative ERP traditionally associated with semantic processing (Kutas & Federmeier, 2011), which amplitude reduction indicates the integration of novel words into the lexicosemantic cognitive system. Interestingly, it has been shown that a rapidly developed N400 has frontal distribution, whereas, a er a consolidation, it typically shi s into centro-parietal areas (Rasamimanana, Barbaroux, Colé, & Besson, 2020).…”
Section: Neuropsychological Correlatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important EEG marker for word processing is N400; this is the negative ERP traditionally associated with semantic processing (Kutas & Federmeier, 2011), which amplitude reduction indicates the integration of novel words into the lexicosemantic cognitive system. Interestingly, it has been shown that a rapidly developed N400 has frontal distribution, whereas, a er a consolidation, it typically shi s into centro-parietal areas (Rasamimanana, Barbaroux, Colé, & Besson, 2020).…”
Section: Neuropsychological Correlatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy to mention that most of the previous EEG studies on word learning focused on event-related brain potentials (ERPs) with the attempt to objectify the neural manifestations underlying the acquisition and consolidation process (Francois, Cunillera, Garcia, Laine, & Rodriguez-Fornells, 2017;Bakker, Takashima, van Hell, Janzen, & McQueen, 2015;Borovsky, Kutas, & Elman, 2010;Dobel, Lagemann, & Zwitserlood, 2009). In this context, the N200 and N400 ERP components have commonly been identified as suitable markers for capturing the reconfiguration of hierarchical neural networks involved in word-to-meaning mapping (Rasamimanana, Barbaroux, Cole, & Besson, 2020;Francois et al, 2017;Dittinger et al, 2016;Junge, Cutler, & Hagoort, 2012). Based on current knowledge, the auditory N200 component is thought to mirror phonetic encoding and categorization processes (Friedrich & Friederici, 2008;Connolly & Phillips, 1994), whereas the N400 response has primarily been associated with the building up of lexical-semantic representations (Kutas & Federmeier, 2011;Borovsky et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, several authors studied the neural bases of the word-meaning acquisition process using associative learning tasks (Bakker-Marshall et al, 2018;Friedrich & Friederici, 2008;von Koss Torkildsen et al, 2008). For example, in a series of experiments with children (Dittinger, Chobert, Ziegler, & Besson, 2017), young adults (Dittinger et al, 2016), students suffering from dyslexia (Rasamimanana et al, 2020), and older adults (Dittinger et al, 2019), Besson et al presented picture-word associations (words = Thai monosyllabic words) to the participants and evaluated N200 and N400 reconfigurations during the wordmeaning acquisition process. Furthermore, in a subsequent "matching task," the authors tested learning performance and evaluated EEG traces while participants had to distinguish between match and mismatch trials based on the previously learned associations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Иной механизм компенсации нарушения за счет использования семантических характеристик был предложен к обсуждению на основании того, что у студентов с дислексией при восприятии слов с семантически связанной или несвязанной картинкой наблюдался больший компонент N400 и сниженный LPC по сравнению с контролем [46]. У детей с дислексией в подобном задании также наблюдалось снижение амплитуды LPC [14].…”
Section: нарушения овладения устной и письменной речьюunclassified