2010
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-282x2010000600026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic aphasia as a sole manifestation of acute stroke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four of the eight patients who did not survive had a cardioembolic stroke, while cardioembolism was the most frequent etiology for patients with global (5) Spontaneous speech* -5 5 14 2 0.0001 (6) Counting from 1 to 20* -4 2 11 1 0.0120 (6) Mentioning the 7 weekdays* -3 3 10 0 0.0046 (6) Singing* -3 4 12 0 0.0001 (6) Phono-articulatory function* -0 4 4 7 0.0043 (6) Constructional praxis (4 matches)* -3 2 14 4 0.0021 (6) Constructional praxis (9 matches)* -2 4 14 6 0.0105 (6) Ideomotor praxis (mean±SD) 5 2.8±1.6 2.4±1.5 1.6±2.0 4.7±0.5 0.0012 (7) SD: standard deviation; MCA: middle cerebral artery. *Number of subjects with difficulties and/or errors; (1) ANOVA; (2) ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (differences between the following groups: capsule-nuclear and whole middle cerebral artery territory; capsule-nuclear and temporal-parietal; capsulenuclear and frontal); (3) ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (differences between the following groups: frontal and temporal-parietal; frontal and whole middle cerebral artery territory; capsule-nuclear and temporal-parietal; capsule-nuclear and whole middle cerebral artery territory); (4) ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (differences between the capsule-nuclear group and the whole middle cerebral artery territory group); (5) ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (differences between the following groups: capsule-nuclear and whole middle cerebral artery territory; capsule-nuclear and frontal); (6) Fisher's exact test; (7) ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (differences between the following groups: capsule-nuclear and temporal-parietal; capsule-nuclear and whole middle cerebral artery territory).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four of the eight patients who did not survive had a cardioembolic stroke, while cardioembolism was the most frequent etiology for patients with global (5) Spontaneous speech* -5 5 14 2 0.0001 (6) Counting from 1 to 20* -4 2 11 1 0.0120 (6) Mentioning the 7 weekdays* -3 3 10 0 0.0046 (6) Singing* -3 4 12 0 0.0001 (6) Phono-articulatory function* -0 4 4 7 0.0043 (6) Constructional praxis (4 matches)* -3 2 14 4 0.0021 (6) Constructional praxis (9 matches)* -2 4 14 6 0.0105 (6) Ideomotor praxis (mean±SD) 5 2.8±1.6 2.4±1.5 1.6±2.0 4.7±0.5 0.0012 (7) SD: standard deviation; MCA: middle cerebral artery. *Number of subjects with difficulties and/or errors; (1) ANOVA; (2) ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (differences between the following groups: capsule-nuclear and whole middle cerebral artery territory; capsule-nuclear and temporal-parietal; capsulenuclear and frontal); (3) ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (differences between the following groups: frontal and temporal-parietal; frontal and whole middle cerebral artery territory; capsule-nuclear and temporal-parietal; capsule-nuclear and whole middle cerebral artery territory); (4) ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (differences between the capsule-nuclear group and the whole middle cerebral artery territory group); (5) ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (differences between the following groups: capsule-nuclear and whole middle cerebral artery territory; capsule-nuclear and frontal); (6) Fisher's exact test; (7) ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (differences between the following groups: capsule-nuclear and temporal-parietal; capsule-nuclear and whole middle cerebral artery territory).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stroke: speech and language Oliveira and Damasceno of speech and language may help neurologists to localize brain injury site and extension even in the absence of other neurological signs, and still in the absence of radiologically defined lesions 1,2 . Classic aphasias have been correlated to specific brain regions and regarded as vascular syndromes 3 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%