2020
DOI: 10.1080/10888438.2020.1781863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic and Phonological Decoding in Children’s Orthographic Learning in Chinese

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
4
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike previous work (Li et al, 2018; 2020b; 2020c), no effect of phonetic regularity was detected in orthographic learning in the present study, probably due to the different operationalisations of the outcome tasks applied across studies. In previous studies (Li et al, 2018; 2020b; 2020c), their orthographic learning outcomes all tapped into the mapping of orthography and pronunciations. In contrast, our orthographic learning task measured meaning‐to‐orthography associations.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unlike previous work (Li et al, 2018; 2020b; 2020c), no effect of phonetic regularity was detected in orthographic learning in the present study, probably due to the different operationalisations of the outcome tasks applied across studies. In previous studies (Li et al, 2018; 2020b; 2020c), their orthographic learning outcomes all tapped into the mapping of orthography and pronunciations. In contrast, our orthographic learning task measured meaning‐to‐orthography associations.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In the current study, we found a facilitative effect of transparent semantic radicals in both orthographic and oral vocabulary learning, consistent with previous findings in orthographic learning (in tasks tapping into meaning‐to‐orthography associations, Li et al, 2020a) and in written vocabulary learning (in tasks measuring orthography‐to‐meaning associations, Li et al, 2020b). Consistently, previous work did not detect any effects of semantic radicals on tasks that did not involve meaning information, as indicated on the tasks assessing pure orthographic representations in Li et al (2020a), and associations between pronunciations and orthography in Li et al (2020b) and Li et al (2020c). Thus, the current findings add to previous literature that the facilitation of transparent semantic radicals might be more likely to be detected when an explicit demand for ascribing meaning is involved.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study was consistent with extensive previous studies (Ho & Bryant, 1997a ; Ho et al, 2003a ; Li et al, 2020 , 2021 ; Yin & McBride, 2015 ) in finding that the PRAs of second-grade students significantly contributed to CS whereas PAL had no additive effect on CS, supporting Hypothesis 1 . This suggests that Chinese children who develop literacy rapidly do not tend to build an arbitrary connection at the whole-character level (via the lexical route); instead, they primarily adopt PRA at the radical level (via the sublexical route) in a top-down manner.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Although Chinese is a nonalphabetic script without phonological recording processing, PRA could still contribute to the acquisition of unfamiliar Chinese characters. For example, Li et al, ( 2020 , 2021 ) tested the self-teaching hypothesis on Chinese second-grade students, with their results supporting the primary role of phonological recoding in character learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%