2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic ambiguity and the failure of inhibition hypothesis as an explanation for reading errors in deep dyslexia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…She was unable to successfully read aloud nonwords and her responses included no response, pseudohomophone and in some instances she responded with real words. More details regarding her performance on various reading and language tasks can be found in our other publications (Buchanan et al, 2003;Colangelo & Buchanan, 2005, 2006Colangelo et al, 2004;).…”
Section: Participantmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…She was unable to successfully read aloud nonwords and her responses included no response, pseudohomophone and in some instances she responded with real words. More details regarding her performance on various reading and language tasks can be found in our other publications (Buchanan et al, 2003;Colangelo & Buchanan, 2005, 2006Colangelo et al, 2004;).…”
Section: Participantmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Many other models of deep dyslexia suggest multiple loci of damage in the reading system (Morton & Patterson, 1980;Plaut & Shallice, 1993). Alternatively, some researchers have proposed that selection impairment in the phonological output lexicon alone can account for various types of reading errors observed in deep dyslexia (Buchanan et al, 2003;Colangelo & Buchanan, 2005, 2006Colangelo, Buchanan, & Westbury, 2004;Katz & Lanzoni, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This type of reading disorder is found almost exclusively as an acquired form observed in adolescents and adults (Siegel, 1985). Although deep dyslexia was once believed to be a semantic processing deficit, recent studies have revealed that deep dyslexics possess an intact semantic system, and semantic errors are likely associated with deficits in 'phonological output' rather than a semantic processing impairment (Colangelo & Buchanan, 2005;Colangelo, Buchanan, & Westbury, 2004). The Failure of Inhibition Theory outlined in these studies proposes that individuals with deep dyslexia are unable to inhibit the production of phonological and semantic errors when reading aloud.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Failure of Inhibition Theory outlined in these studies proposes that individuals with deep dyslexia are unable to inhibit the production of phonological and semantic errors when reading aloud. Neuroanatomical studies of deep dyslexia directly implicate damage in and around the left temporal parietal region (Colangelo & Buchanan, 2005;Dickerson & Johnson, 2004;Southwood & Chatterjee, 1999). In brief, phonological dyslexia, surface dyslexia and deep dyslexia have diverse symptoms, with a notable overlap between deep and phonological dyslexia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hypothesis is based primarily on data from a single case of deep dyslexia, patient JO, whose responses the authors interpret as intact implicit access to semantics, intact explicit access to semantics in the absence of production, and deficient explicit access in tasks requiring production (Colangelo & Buchanan, 2005, 2007). To test implicit access, JO completed a lexical decision task and performed within accuracy ranges of controls, leading the authors to conclude that implicit semantic processing was intact (Colangelo & Buchanan, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%