Semantic Adaptation and Competition during Word Comprehension

Abstract

Word comprehension engages the left ventrolateral prefrontal (lVLPFC) and posterior lateral-temporal cortices (PLTC). The contributions of these brain regions to comprehension remain controversial. We hypothesized that the PLTC activates meanings, whereas the lVLPFC resolves competition between representations. To test this hypothesis, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to assess the independent effects of adaptation and competition on neural activity. Participants judged the relatedness of word pairs. Some consecutive pairs contained a common ambiguous word. The same or different meanings of this word were primed (e.g., SUMMER-FAN, CEILING-FAN; ADMIRER-FAN, CEILING-FAN). Based on the logic of fMRI adaptation, trials with more semantic overlap should produce more adaptation (less activation) in regions that activate meaning. In contrast, trials with more semantic ambiguity should produce more activation in regions that resolve competition. We observed a double dissociation between activity in the PLTC and lVLPFC. LPLTC activity depended on the amount of semantic overlap, irrespective of the amount of semantic ambiguity. In contrast, lVLPFC activity depended on the amount of semantic ambiguity. Moreover, across participants the size of the competition effect as measured by errors was correlated with the size of the competition effect in the lVLPFC. We conclude that the lVLPFC is an executive mechanism within language processing.

Distinct loci of lexical and semantic access deficits in aphasia: Evidence from voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping and diffusion tensor imaging

“…Structurally, the ILF connects the inferior posterior temporal lobe (a region thought to serve as an "entry point" affording access to lexical and semantic representations, e.g., Damasio, Tranel, Grabowski, Adolphs, & Damasio, 2004;Démonet, Thierry, & Cardebat, 2005; see also Bedny, McGill, & Thompson-Schill, 2008), with the ATL (a region though to support semantic processing; Patterson et al, 2007;Mummery et al, 2000). Combined functional gray matter and structural white matter neuroimaging experiments of healthy subjects reveal that this pathway mediates mapping lexical with semantic representations during comprehension (Saur et al, 2008(Saur et al, , 2010Wong, Chandrasekaran, Garibaldi, & Wong, 2011).…”

Hearing and seeing meaning in speech and gesture: insights from brain and behaviour

“…However, not all studies have found greater activation in STSp that reflected a specific role in semantic integration of speech and gesture. For example, Dick et al [39] did not find gesture studies areas of the brain involved in disambiguating speech when it is produced with gesture (squares) and without it (circles) language studies Dick et al [39] Bedny et al [50] Gennari et al [51] Rodd et al [53] Snijders et al [54] Whitney et al [55] Zempleni et al…”

Pathways to lexical ambiguity: fMRI evidence for bilateral fronto-parietal involvement in language processing

“…Several neuroimaging experiments have investigated the neural systems underlying the processing of ambiguous words (Chan, Liu, Yip, Fox, Gao, & Tan, 2004;Copland, de Zubicaray, McMahon, & Eastburn, 2007;Mason & Just, 2007;Rodd, Davis, & Johnsrude, 2005;Zempleni, Renken, Hoeks, Hoogduin, & Stowe, 2007), and although some studies have shown increased activation in the RH during the processing of lexical ambiguity (e.g., Bilenko et al, 2008;Chan et al, 2004;Mason & Just, 2007;Rodd et al, 2005;Zempleni et al, 2007), others have not (e.g., Bedny et al, 2008;Chen et al, 2008;Grindrod et al, 2008;Hoenig & Scheef, 2009;Ihara et al, 2007;Rapp et al, 2004;Rapp et al, 2007;Lee & Dapretto, 2006), leading to unanswered questions regarding the role of the RH in the processing of lexical ambiguity.…”