2008 the Third International Multi-Conference on Computing in the Global Information Technology (Iccgi 2008) 2008
DOI: 10.1109/iccgi.2008.46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic Access Control in Web Based Communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, recent work proposed to adopt semantic policies to control access to resources in social networking applications, such as Facebook [16] [17]. Both works propose, with some differ-ences, to represent policies as Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) rules 7 : by reasoning on the social knowledge base, represented in OWL, they derive the set of active permissions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, recent work proposed to adopt semantic policies to control access to resources in social networking applications, such as Facebook [16] [17]. Both works propose, with some differ-ences, to represent policies as Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) rules 7 : by reasoning on the social knowledge base, represented in OWL, they derive the set of active permissions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, only few solutions provide user-interfaces. In particular, [3] provides a user-interface, which however requires to deal with concepts like strong/weak conditions that might not be intuitive to define in practice, while [17] requires to deal directly with a SWRL editor. Our GUI allows non technical users to specify policies without dealing with the underlying SPARQL model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complex relations considered in Online Social Networks (OSNs) and the associated applications highlight the need for semantic organisation of the contained knowledge and for semantic access control mechanisms. In this context, the work presented in [12] leverages ontologies for representing relationships with the individuals and the community in order to determine the access restrictions to community resources. Carminati et al provide in [6] a much richer OWL ontology for modelling various aspects of OSNs, while also proposing authorisation, administration and filtering policies that depend on trust relationships among various users.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, they focus on and capture a limited number of concepts, constraints and access parameters, missing the necessary expressiveness for the specification of complex provisions and access structures. For instance, only few of these models (e.g., [6] [12][25] [34]) are privacy-aware, yet they do not provide support for separation and binding of duty constraints, whereas presenting limited, if any, context-awareness. Moreover, the semantic taxonomies created within existing approaches are typically limited to very basic hierarchies (e.g., of roles), with no support for relations beyond is-a generalisations, or complex expressions and logical relations thereof.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, semantic web technologies have been used to model and express finegrained access control policies for OSNs (e.g., [5,10,21]). Especially, Carminati et al [5] proposed a semantic web based access control framework for social networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%