2017
DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2017/30292.10603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SEM Evaluation of Enamel Surface Changes and Enamel Microhardness around Orthodontic Brackets after Application of CO2 Laser, Er,Cr:YSGG Laser and Fluoride Varnish: An In vivo Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that both types of laser treatments improved the enamel acid resistance significantly. Our findings were in agreement with many previously reported results concerning acquired enamel acid resistance following treatment with Er, Cr: YSGG laser application [14], [21] or nanosecond Nd: YAG laser [11], [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This indicates that both types of laser treatments improved the enamel acid resistance significantly. Our findings were in agreement with many previously reported results concerning acquired enamel acid resistance following treatment with Er, Cr: YSGG laser application [14], [21] or nanosecond Nd: YAG laser [11], [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This was based on previous studies which compared this power (0.75 W) with other Er, Cr: YSGG power values or with other types of lasers. Results revealed that 0.75 W power gave the best results regarding acid resistance enhancement [20], [21], [22]. The power of nanosecond Nd: YAG laser used in the herein study was 0.8 W. It was selected according to a previous pilot study done with 3 samples with different powers; 0.5 W, 0.8 W and 1.2 W. The power of 0.8 W revealed the best results concerning the morphological and elemental analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, SEM analysis of enamel surface radiated with CO 2 laser appeared rough and cracked, which might act as retentive areas for plaque. In contrast to Er,Cr:YSGG group which revealed a smooth and glossy surface devoid of any cracks, making enamel impervious to acidic dissolution [39], [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final enamel topography was the outcome of the amount of energy absorbed by the enamel, the resulting change of its mechanical properties, and the applied shear forces. It should be noted that when Er,Cr:YSGG [27] or Er:YAG [28] increases enamel microhardness, fracture toughness will decrease, as these two measures are inversely proportional [29]. This may lead to a more brittle enamel, where the risk of enamel microcracks formation and enamel loss is increased when debonding ceramic brackets.…”
Section: Shear Bond Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%