2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/2960194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SEM Analysis of Surface Impact on Biofilm Antibiotic Treatment

Abstract: The aim of this work was to use scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to investigate the effect of ampicillin treatment on Escherichia coli biofilms formed on two surface materials with different properties, silicone (SIL) and glass (GLA). Epifluorescence microscopy (EM) was initially used to assess biofilm formation and killing efficiency on both surfaces. This technique showed that higher bacterial colonization was obtained in the hydrophobic SIL than in the hydrophilic GLA. It has also shown that higher biofil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
55
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(67 reference statements)
4
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bacterial adhesion in the treated samples was significantly lower than the untreated samples, with bacteria in the treated biofilm having abnormal cell shape and damage to the cell surface. These observations are similar to the recent reports of Gomes and Mergulhão, who used SEM to determine the morphological changes in biofilm during and after treatment. SEM provides accurate information about the surface and the position of biofilm cells but it does not provide quantitative data for statistical analysis …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Bacterial adhesion in the treated samples was significantly lower than the untreated samples, with bacteria in the treated biofilm having abnormal cell shape and damage to the cell surface. These observations are similar to the recent reports of Gomes and Mergulhão, who used SEM to determine the morphological changes in biofilm during and after treatment. SEM provides accurate information about the surface and the position of biofilm cells but it does not provide quantitative data for statistical analysis …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In this regard, the reactive diluent BDE inside the unfilled and nanofilled epoxy precursor based on TGMDA has proven to be a key in reducing the viscosity of the epoxy matrix [2][3][4][5]8,[32][33][34][35][36]. Surface analysis methods have contributed to recent advancements in science, technology and industrial development [37,38]. The development of the scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) revolutionized the study of nanoscale and atomic scale surface structures and properties [39], most of all in the case of electrically conductive nanofillers embedded in matrix [36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). 27 Confocal and SEM images of an untreated bacterial biolms showed the formation of well-dened and homogenous bio-lms ( Fig. 2(1a and 2a)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The reaction was allowed to warm up to R.T. and stirred until no more starting benzimidazole was observed by TLC (100% EtOAc) (2-3 hours). The reaction was then quenched with water and the aqueous layer was extracted three times with EtOAc, dried over Na 2 SO 4 and puried using silica gel chromatography (100% EtOAc) to afford the corresponding alkylated benzimidazole(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)). Yield 62%, 1 H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ) d 8.42 (s, 1H), 7.71-7.63 (m, 1H), 7.57-7.46 (m, 3H), 7.29-7.24 (m, 2H), 7.24-7.15 (m, 2H), 5.49 (s, 2H).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%