Selling luxury goods online: effects of online accessibility and price display

Abstract

Purpose – Luxury goods manufacturers have long been hesitant to adopt the internet as a channel of distribution. A luxury brand’s concept of exclusiveness is seemingly incompatible with the ubiquitous accessibility provided by the mass medium internet. The purpose of this paper is to address the apparent contradiction by examining consumer responses to the online accessibility and price display of luxury goods. Design/methodology/approach – Three studies are presented: first, a qualitative pre-study with luxury industry experts is conducted to identify the current managerial discussion on the online distribution of luxury goods. Second, an experiment with 183 high-income individuals is conducted to test the effects of online accessibility on consumer perceived scarcity and desirability. Third, a second experiment with 142 qualified luxury insiders is conducted to test consumer responses to the online accessibility and price display of luxury goods. Findings – Results indicate that the online accessibility of luxury goods does not affect consumer perceived scarcity and, hence, does not dilute brand desirability. This “no-dilution” finding applies to both high- and low-involvement goods and persists independently of whether or not retail prices are explicitly displayed. Originality/value – Whether or not to sell luxury goods online has been controversially discussed among both marketing scholars and executives. To the authors’ knowledge, the present paper is the first to empirically examine consumer responses to the online accessibility and price display of luxury goods.

Exploring antecedents of social media usage in B2B: a systematic review

“…This result gains support from the previous study that consumers' trust allows the firms to become more confident in selling their products, which implies on pricing capability (Konuk, 2015). To fully maintain pricing capability in the social relationship context, firms need to be economically viable (Kluge and Fassnacht, 2015).…”

“…In a high-pressure business environment, a salesperson may be tempted to use hard selling approaches, which may undermine a company's ability to build long-lasting relationships with its customers based on trust (Guenzi et al, 2016). Firms with premium price need to be economically viable to fully maintain trust and pricing capability in the social relationship context (Kluge and Fassnacht, 2015).…”

The internet dilemma: An exploratory study of luxury firms’ usage of internet-based technologies

“…A study of luxury wristwatch manufacturers found that communication and interactivity tools were used on a large scale (Barbosa et al, 2013). Thus, despite the reluctance of many luxury brands to move many of their customer-facing activities online, there appears to be growing consensus that luxury brands find value in using the Internet and social media platforms to achieve their strategic goals (Kluge and Fassnacht, 2015). Thus, a second consideration for luxury firms is whether they will use the capabilities of the Internet to engage in one-way or two-way communication.…”

Millennials’ Attitudes Toward Online Luxury Buying Behavior in South Korea: A Q-methodology Approach

“…On the other hand, shoppers may not be purchasing online because of some potential risks related with Internet shopping including credit card fraud, an absence of touch before buying the product, possible problems with the returned goods (Bhatnagar, Mishra & Rao, 2000) and not receiving the ordered product (Forsythe & Shi, 2013;Joines, Scherer & Scheufele, 2003). For consumers, buying of luxury goods online has raised some concerns, regarding the lack of touch (Kluge & Fassnacht, 2015;Pappas, 2016), security (Wu, Chen & Chaney, 2013;Liu, Burns & Hou, 2013). To understand typology of Korean millennials' attitudes toward online luxury purchasing behavior, this study provides the following three components: 1) attitude; 2) luxury consumption; and 3) online shopping.…”