2014
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/12/009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-unitarization of New Higgs Inflation and compatibility with Planck and BICEP2 data

Abstract: In this paper we show that the Germani-Kehagias model of Higgs inflation (or New Higgs Inflation), where the Higgs boson is kinetically non-minimally coupled to the Einstein tensor is in perfect compatibility with the latest Planck and BICEP2 data. Moreover, we show that the tension between the Planck and BICEP2 data can be relieved within the New Higgs inflation scenario by a negative running of the spectral index. Regarding the unitarity of the model, we argue that it is unitary throughout the evolution of t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theory (10), seems to lose tree-level perturbative unitarity when the potential reaches the transition value Λ 4 t [11]. However, perturbative unitarity is actually not lost.…”
Section: Higgs-gravity Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The theory (10), seems to lose tree-level perturbative unitarity when the potential reaches the transition value Λ 4 t [11]. However, perturbative unitarity is actually not lost.…”
Section: Higgs-gravity Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, perturbative unitarity is actually not lost. Indeed, at the same scale a non-negligible gravitational background is generated, leading to a kinetic mixing between the graviton and the Higgs boson [11]. Upon diagonalization of the Higgs-graviton system, one discovers that the unitarity violation scale is actually background dependent.…”
Section: Higgs-gravity Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For illustrative purposes, we will fix N = 60. Once I is given, all parameters of the system are only tight to the value of the amplitude of scalar perturbations [22] …”
Section: Numerics: the Case Of New Higgs Inflationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, see [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. We believe that it is still too early to say which model is correct.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%