1995
DOI: 10.1016/0196-8904(95)00054-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-trapping mechanisms of carbon dioxide in the aquifer disposal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CO 2 (l) injected below the NBZ is buoyant at the point of injection and will rise until it reaches the bottom of the HFZ. As the CO 2 (l) flows into the HFZ, it will form CO 2 hydrates, which will clog the pore space and form a cap that limits the upward migration of the remaining CO 2 (l) (29). If the hydrate cap does not form an impermeable seal, then some CO 2 (l) may flow within the HFZ to the bottom of the NBZ.…”
Section: Postinjection Chemistry and Sediment Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CO 2 (l) injected below the NBZ is buoyant at the point of injection and will rise until it reaches the bottom of the HFZ. As the CO 2 (l) flows into the HFZ, it will form CO 2 hydrates, which will clog the pore space and form a cap that limits the upward migration of the remaining CO 2 (l) (29). If the hydrate cap does not form an impermeable seal, then some CO 2 (l) may flow within the HFZ to the bottom of the NBZ.…”
Section: Postinjection Chemistry and Sediment Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For successful CO 2 sequestration in heterogeneous subsurface formations, the practicability of the CO 2 sequestration process based on storage capacity and leakage prevention should be guaranteed before the field scale CO 2 injection. The previous research over the last two decades revealed that the injection of supercritical CO 2 (scCO 2 ) into a reservoir rock initiates a geochemical reaction in the scCO 2 -rock-groundwater system, but it does not threaten the storage safety of CO 2 reservoir formations because of its long reaction time [18][19][20]. However, in the past five years, several studies have cast doubts on whether the rate of the scCO 2 -rock-groundwater reaction is too slow to affect the change of CO 2 storage capacity and leakage safety after scCO 2 injection [21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2] Field observations suggest that gas transport through water-filled soft sediment is an essential component of seafloor dynamics, which controls natural gas seeps and vent sites [Heeschen et al, 2003;Best et al, 2006], the mechanical and acoustic properties of submarine sediments [Anderson and Hampton, 1980;Waite et al, 2008], the creation of pockmarks in the ocean floor [Hovland et al, 2002] and the viability of carbon dioxide sequestration in the sub-seafloor, either by hydrate formation [Koide et al, 1995] or gravitational trapping [Koide et al, 1997].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%