2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2019.00831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Training With Progressive Augmentation for Unsupervised Cross-Domain Person Re-Identification

Abstract: Person re-identification (Re-ID) has achieved great improvement with deep learning and a large amount of labelled training data. However, it remains a challenging task for adapting a model trained in a source domain of labelled data to a target domain of only unlabelled data available. In this work, we develop a self-training method with progressive augmentation framework (PAST) to promote the model performance progressively on the target dataset. Specially, our PAST framework consists of two stages, namely, c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
199
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
199
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison with recent works shows that our methods outperform state-of-theart works by a large margin. For instance, using DukeMTMC-reID as the source domain, our method achieves Rank-1 accuracy of 88.3% on Market-1501, outperforming recent PAST [49] and SSG [7] by 9.9% and 8.3%, respectively. We also test our method in unsupervised scenario, i.e., training the ReID model only with GLO.…”
Section: Figure 1: Illustration Of Proposed Coupling Optimization Metmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparison with recent works shows that our methods outperform state-of-theart works by a large margin. For instance, using DukeMTMC-reID as the source domain, our method achieves Rank-1 accuracy of 88.3% on Market-1501, outperforming recent PAST [49] and SSG [7] by 9.9% and 8.3%, respectively. We also test our method in unsupervised scenario, i.e., training the ReID model only with GLO.…”
Section: Figure 1: Illustration Of Proposed Coupling Optimization Metmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, local label prediction is not precise and will mislead the distance optimization. Based on assigned labels, some works adopt triplet loss for model training [7,33,46,49]. However, these optimization methods fail to consider the noise in predicted labels on unlabeled dataset.…”
Section: Domain Adaptive Person Re-identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For another aspect, several researches [8], [19], [30], [45] introduce a dependable pseudo identity labels generator to assist the training in unlabeled target domain. Specifically, the works [8], [30], [45] utilize the density-based clustering algorithm [3], [7] for label estimation, which has improved the pseudo-label reliability. In addition, the works [8], [45] also employ part division as the supplemental feature to obtain satisfactory performance.…”
Section: A Unsupervised Cross-domain Person Re-identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the works [8], [30], [45] utilize the density-based clustering algorithm [3], [7] for label estimation, which has improved the pseudo-label reliability. In addition, the works [8], [45] also employ part division as the supplemental feature to obtain satisfactory performance. In practical, these methods still obtain limited performance because they neglect the detailed local information in unlabeled target data.…”
Section: A Unsupervised Cross-domain Person Re-identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation