Self-tests for influenza: an empirical ethics investigation

Abstract

BackgroundIn this article we aim to assess the ethical desirability of self-test diagnostic kits for influenza, focusing in particular on the potential benefits and challenges posed by a new, mobile phone-based tool currently being developed by i-sense, an interdisciplinary research collaboration based (primarily) at University College London and funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council.MethodsOur study adopts an empirical ethics approach, supplementing an initial review into the ethical considerations posed by such technologies with qualitative data from three focus groups.ResultsOverall, we map a range of possible considerations both for and against the use of such technologies, synthesizing evidence from a range of secondary literature, as well as identifying several new considerations previously overlooked.ConclusionsWe argue that no single consideration marks these technologies as either entirely permissible or impermissible but rather tools which have the potential to incur certain costs and benefits, and that context is important in determining these. In the latter stages of the article, we explain how developers of such technologies might seek to mitigate such costs and reflect on the possible limitations of the empirical ethics method brought out during the study.Trial registrationNot applicable.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12910-017-0192-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Telehealth and Artificial Intelligence Insights into Healthcare during the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…Comprehensive legislation like the General Data Protection Regulation in the EU has started to tackle this issue, but more tailor-made methods, such as the voluntary privacy code for mHealth apps [ 81 ], are needed. Recent ethics studies [ 82 ] also found that consumers need to consider and agree to all facets of the use of their results.…”

Taking connected mobile-health diagnostics of infectious diseases to the field

“…Broad regulations such as the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) are beginning to address this, but more tailored approaches like the voluntary code of conduct on privacy for mHealth apps77 are needed. Moreover, recent ethics studies78 have highlighted the need for users to understand and consent to all aspects of how their data will be used.…”

Biological characteristics and biomarkers of novel SARS-CoV-2 facilitated rapid development and implementation of diagnostic tools and surveillance measures

“…The latest ethical studies have stressed the need for people to understand and consent to all aspects of how their personal data will be utilized ( Rumbold et al, 2017 ). Integrated platforms to share data, standardize security, organize collected data, and improve mHealth app connectivity and services are presented in the developmental stage ( Chen et al, 2012 ).…”