2020
DOI: 10.1080/01691864.2020.1857305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-supervised optical flow derotation network for rotation estimation of a spherical camera

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…VG algorithms consider two kinds of information, direct or indirect. An Indirect VG (IVG) leverages image features, either handcrafted as patches around image points [5,8] or learnt to estimate the optical flow [7]. Instead, a Direct VG (DVG) almost considers directly pixel brightness of the whole image as input of a 3D rotation optimization method [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…VG algorithms consider two kinds of information, direct or indirect. An Indirect VG (IVG) leverages image features, either handcrafted as patches around image points [5,8] or learnt to estimate the optical flow [7]. Instead, a Direct VG (DVG) almost considers directly pixel brightness of the whole image as input of a 3D rotation optimization method [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the absence of features, DVGs could recently reach very large estimation domains such as up to 360 deg in static environment [3]. But the rotation estimation error is still of the order of 1 deg (for real-time or close to real-time setups) whereas Neural Networks could recently reach 0.3 deg [7], though within a much tighter estimation domain of [−5; 5] deg around each axis. This error level is still problematic as it gets to be accumulated over time within 360 deg video stabilization [8] or visual odometry [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation