Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3404835.3462862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-supervised Graph Learning for Recommendation

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
483
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 637 publications
(485 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
483
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the research of self-supervised learning is still in its infancy, there are only several studies incorporating it with recommender systems [31], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45]. Some of these efforts mine the self-supervision signals from sequential data [31], [43], [45] and others capture the structure properties from user-item bipartite graph [41], [44] or social graph [42].…”
Section: Self-supervised Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the research of self-supervised learning is still in its infancy, there are only several studies incorporating it with recommender systems [31], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45]. Some of these efforts mine the self-supervision signals from sequential data [31], [43], [45] and others capture the structure properties from user-item bipartite graph [41], [44] or social graph [42].…”
Section: Self-supervised Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the research of self-supervised learning is still in its infancy, there are only several studies incorporating it with recommender systems [31], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45]. Some of these efforts mine the self-supervision signals from sequential data [31], [43], [45] and others capture the structure properties from user-item bipartite graph [41], [44] or social graph [42]. Different from the above approaches, our work is the first to consider the correlations between the collaborative features originated from interaction behaviors and user's/item's inherent content features, and we adopt the generative and contrastive self-supervised learning jointly under these two types of features to tackle the cold-start problem in recommendation.…”
Section: Self-supervised Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the remarkable success, existing neural graph collaborative filtering methods still suffer from two major issues. Firstly, user-item interaction data is usually sparse or noisy, and it may not be able to learn reliable representations since the graph-based methods are potentially more vulnerable to data sparsity [33]. Secondly, existing GNN based CF approaches rely on explicit interaction links for learning node representations, while high-order relations or constraints (e.g., user or item similarity) cannot be explicitly utilized for enriching the graph information, which has been shown essentially useful in recommendation tasks [24,27,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, existing GNN based CF approaches rely on explicit interaction links for learning node representations, while high-order relations or constraints (e.g., user or item similarity) cannot be explicitly utilized for enriching the graph information, which has been shown essentially useful in recommendation tasks [24,27,35]. Although several recent studies leverage constative learning to alleviate the sparsity of interaction data [33,39], they construct the contrastive pairs by randomly sampling nodes or corrupting subgraphs. It lacks consideration on how to construct more meaningful contrastive learning tasks tailored for the recommendation task [24,27,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation