2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/cvprw50498.2020.00175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Supervised Domain Mismatch Estimation for Autonomous Perception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among online-capable metrics for the overall performance prediction, some only focus at malfunction detection and correction (again involving an ensemble of DNNs) [17], [64], or exploit temporal inconsistency between consecutive predictions [15], which has to be defined in a highly task-specific way. The closest prior work to ours is presumably from Löhdefink et al [18], who propose to train an autoencoder to reconstruct an image on the same data a semantic segmentation DNN is trained on, showing a correlation between both task's metrics. Note, however, that the method from [18] is only applicable when using statistics over a large number of images.…”
Section: Performance Prediction Of Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among online-capable metrics for the overall performance prediction, some only focus at malfunction detection and correction (again involving an ensemble of DNNs) [17], [64], or exploit temporal inconsistency between consecutive predictions [15], which has to be defined in a highly task-specific way. The closest prior work to ours is presumably from Löhdefink et al [18], who propose to train an autoencoder to reconstruct an image on the same data a semantic segmentation DNN is trained on, showing a correlation between both task's metrics. Note, however, that the method from [18] is only applicable when using statistics over a large number of images.…”
Section: Performance Prediction Of Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The closest prior work to ours is presumably from Löhdefink et al [18], who propose to train an autoencoder to reconstruct an image on the same data a semantic segmentation DNN is trained on, showing a correlation between both task's metrics. Note, however, that the method from [18] is only applicable when using statistics over a large number of images. While the mentioned works propose additional metrics for the online performance evaluation of DNNs, none of them shows the capability to operate on a single-image basis to predict and quantify a DNN's absolute performance, which our method indeed is capable of with good fidelity.…”
Section: Performance Prediction Of Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, temporal consistency of consecutive predictions can be checked [55], though the definition of consistency is highly task-specific. A recent successful approach of Löhdefink et al [34] estimates the performance of a semantic segmentation model based on the image reconstruction error of an autoencoder DNN. Similarly, Klingner et al [30] use the depth estimation task for this purpose.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some initial works intend to mitigate the problem by temporal or network ensemble consistency checks [17,51,55], however, these approaches are not straightforward extendable to arbitrary tasks. Another approach uses an autoencoder to predict the performance based on the image reconstruction error [34]. This has, however, not been shown to be applicable on a few-shot basis, which would be necessary for online operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%