2014
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-2014-05721-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-shrinkers with a rotational symmetry

Abstract: In this paper we present a new family of non-compact properly embedded, self-shrinking, asymptotically conical, positive mean curvature ends Σ n ⊆ R n+1 that are hypersurfaces of revolution with circular boundaries. These hypersurface families interpolate between the plane and half-cylinder in R n+1 , and any rotationally symmetric self-shrinking non-compact end belongs to our family. The proofs involve the global analysis of a cubic-derivative quasi-linear ODE.We also prove the following classification result… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
67
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(13 reference statements)
1
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Immersed self-shrinkers: Building on the work in [9,16,43], infinitely many immersed and non-embedded self-shrinkers for each of the rotational topological types: S n , S 1 × S n−1 , R n , and S 1 × R n−1 were constructed in [20]. The main idea for the construction is to study the behavior of solutions to the geodesic equation near two known self-shrinkers and use continuity arguments to find complete self-shrinkers between them.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• Immersed self-shrinkers: Building on the work in [9,16,43], infinitely many immersed and non-embedded self-shrinkers for each of the rotational topological types: S n , S 1 × S n−1 , R n , and S 1 × R n−1 were constructed in [20]. The main idea for the construction is to study the behavior of solutions to the geodesic equation near two known self-shrinkers and use continuity arguments to find complete self-shrinkers between them.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The embeddedness assumption is necessary due to the existence of immersed and non-embedded S 3 self-shinkers constructed in [16,20]. Uniqueness is known in the rotational case [17,43].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Cavalcante and Espinar [1] proved a halfspace theorem for self-shrinkers properly immersed in R n+1 . The proof uses the idea of Hoffman and Meeks and a catenoid type self-shrinker discovered by Kleene and Moller [20]. Note that there are many examples of compact self-shrinkers and noncompact proper self-shrinkers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See f.ex. the halfspace theorem for self-shrinkers in [CE16], and note how the asymptotically conical self-shrinkers in [KM14] can easily be cut to get such examples which are noncompact with compact boundary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%