2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.09.25.20183459
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-sampling of capillary blood for serological testing of SARS-CoV-2 by COVID-19 IgG ELISA

Abstract: Serological testing is emerging as a powerful tool to progress our understanding of COVID-19 exposure, transmission and immune response. Large-scale testing is limited by the need for in-person blood collection by staff trained in venepuncture. Capillary blood self-sampling and postage to laboratories for analysis could provide a reliable alternative. Two-hundred and nine matched venous and capillary blood samples were obtained from thirty nine participants and analysed using a COVID-19 IgG ELISA to detect an… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sera from patients with RT-qPCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (n=84) were provided by Liverpool Clinical Laboratories (LCL) as leftover diagnostic samples. Participants with RT-qPCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who did not result in hospital attendance (n=12) were also recruited (7). In addition, the NIBSC COVID-19 convalescent plasma panel, human (20/118), as well as NIBSC 20/130 plasma positive control were used for the evaluation.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sera from patients with RT-qPCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (n=84) were provided by Liverpool Clinical Laboratories (LCL) as leftover diagnostic samples. Participants with RT-qPCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who did not result in hospital attendance (n=12) were also recruited (7). In addition, the NIBSC COVID-19 convalescent plasma panel, human (20/118), as well as NIBSC 20/130 plasma positive control were used for the evaluation.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%