1998
DOI: 10.2307/2647646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Respect and Rawlsian Justice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 The significant empirical component of disputes over the social bases of self-respect is often unacknowledged; or, if recognized, is typically not pursued. For example, Rawls's claim that self-respect should, within the terms of a Rawlsian society, be robust against economic inequality has been the subject of much criticism (for example Miller 1978, 18;Penny 2013;Zaino 1998). Yet little in the way of countervailing empirical evidence has been brought forth to support these critiques.…”
Section: Motivated Empirical Reasoning In Political Theory: Applying mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 The significant empirical component of disputes over the social bases of self-respect is often unacknowledged; or, if recognized, is typically not pursued. For example, Rawls's claim that self-respect should, within the terms of a Rawlsian society, be robust against economic inequality has been the subject of much criticism (for example Miller 1978, 18;Penny 2013;Zaino 1998). Yet little in the way of countervailing empirical evidence has been brought forth to support these critiques.…”
Section: Motivated Empirical Reasoning In Political Theory: Applying mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 24. This is why Rawls’s claim that the self-respect of the worst-off in a just Rawlsian society is protected because they will be part of ‘non-comparing’ groups is thought to be so troubling. On this see Zaino (1998). …”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The cardinal role thatnotions of respect and self-respect playinRawls's ATheory of Justice has alreadybeen abundantlyexamined in the literature (Bernick 1978, Eyal 2005,K eat and Miller1974, Nielsen 1979,Shue 1975,Zaino 1998;recentlyin the context of Rawls'sargument for stability Zink 2011). On the otherhand,ithas hardlyb een noticed that these notions are also central for Michael Walzer's Spheres of Justice.² While Walzer clearlyd istinguishesb etween "self-respect" and "self-esteem",R awls usest he two terms as synonyms (Walzer1 983, p. 274;Rawls 1971,p.440, §67).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%