2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett.2c01856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Resetting Bistable Redox Molecular Machines for Fullerene Recognition

Abstract: Addressing control over molecular machines resulting in variable output modulation by mimicking nature mechanisms is a current hot topic. The exploitation of reversibility in thiol/disulfide motifs in chemical systems flanked by nonplanar corannulene moieties capable to recognize fullerenes is presented herein. Two redox-based machines have been conceived for this purpose: an ON/OFF switch that activates its binding properties upon dimerization and a self-resetting (i.e., with an automated backward process) ho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(69 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a trend of a lower QY as the bridgehead group becomes more acceptor. Measured decay lifetimes (τ) range from 5.08 to 10.54 ns, fitted with a mono-exponential function, for most of the hosts, which are typical values for this kind of compounds, confirming the existence of a fluorescent singlet excited state (Table ). Interestingly, hosts 11-CO and 11-C­(CN) 2 display a different behavior with respect to the rest of the family.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…There is a trend of a lower QY as the bridgehead group becomes more acceptor. Measured decay lifetimes (τ) range from 5.08 to 10.54 ns, fitted with a mono-exponential function, for most of the hosts, which are typical values for this kind of compounds, confirming the existence of a fluorescent singlet excited state (Table ). Interestingly, hosts 11-CO and 11-C­(CN) 2 display a different behavior with respect to the rest of the family.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…This arrangement is typically set to avoid internal hydrogen repulsion (H 3 in this case). This is very common in tethers with a short spacer group and a lack of conformational mobility (see the Supporting Information for the full set of optimized structures). ,,, In a closer inspection to computed geometries, key structural factors such as penetration depths (distance between the centroid of the corannulene bowl and the centroid of the fullerene moiety) and clamping depth (distance between the midpoint of the bond connecting both phenyl units in the tether and the centroid of the fullerene moiety) reveal that, while the location of C 60 between two corannulenes is kept throughout the whole series (6.86 Å on average) it is farther within the S-derived subfamily than in the other hosts (7.40 vs 7.18 Å on average) (Figure S172 and Table S8). This seems to be a consequence of the longer S–C 1 bond distance (1.80 vs 1.48 Å on average) (Table S8) pointing toward a better adaptation ability of the tether within hosts 4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations