Self-reported personality traits in forensic populations: a meta-analysis

Spaans, Marleen; Molendijk, Marc L.; Beurs, Edwin de; Rinne, Thomas; Spinhoven, Philip

doi:10.1080/1068316x.2016.1220555

Cited by 19 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 83 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…With regard to moderator variables, the type of assessment used to capture psychological disorders was seen to have a significant effect, with proportions of depressive disorder diagnoses lower when diagnostic interviews were used than self-report measures. This is in line with previous meta-analyses, which document that the use of diagnostic interviews (compared to self-report measures) tended to result in lower estimates of prevalence rates (Osborn et al, 2016; Spaans et al, 2017). Self-report measures and diagnostic interviews both capture important information regarding symptomatology; however, diagnostic interviews go beyond these data by exploring the level of functional impact stemming from these symptoms, helping to better guide clinical decision making.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

“…Previous meta-analyses have also identified that diagnostic interviews, relative to self-report measures, tend to result in lower and narrower estimates of prevalence rates (Osborn, Mathias, Fairweather-Schmidt, 2016; Spaans, Molendijk, de Beurs, Rinne, & Spinhoven, 2017). Self-report measures typically assess presence and severity of symptoms and often do not assess the degree of functional impairment stemming from these symptoms, which is ultimately required for diagnosis (Cabizuca, Marques-Portella, Mendlowicz, Coutinho, & Figueira, 2009).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Psychopathology in parents of children with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence

Schnabel

Youssef

Hallford

et al. 2019

Autism

106

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Parents of children with autism spectrum disorder appear to experience high levels of psychological distress, yet little is known about the prevalence of psychological disorders in this population. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate the proportion of these parents who experience clinically significant psychopathology. Articles reporting proportions of psychological disorders in a sample of parents of children with autism spectrum disorder were located. The initial search returned 25,988 articles. Thirty-one studies with a total sample of 9208 parents were included in the final review. The median meta-analytic proportions were 31% (95% confidence interval = [24%, 38%]) for depressive disorders, 33% (95% confidence interval = [20%, 48%]) for anxiety disorders, 10% (95% confidence interval = [1%, 41%]) for obsessive-compulsive disorder, 4% (95% confidence interval = [0%, 22%]) for personality disorders, 2% (95% confidence interval = [1%, 4%]) for alcohol and substance use disorders and 1% (95% confidence interval = [0%, 5%]) for schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Significant heterogeneity was detected in these categories. Further research is needed to gain more insight into variables that may moderate parental psychopathology. This review and meta-analysis is the first to provide prevalence estimates of psychological disorders in parents of children with autism spectrum disorder.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychopathology in parents of children with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence

Schnabel

Youssef

Hallford

et al. 2019

Autism

106

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Community‐dwelling adults displayed significantly higher levels of SP, Intentionality, Blame, and Anger compared to the inmate population. A meta‐analytic review that focused on studies comparing the forensic populations to norm scores of non‐forensic samples showed, contradictory to expectations, no significant differences for self‐reported impulsivity, anger, aggression, or hostility (Spaans, Molendijk, de Beurs, Rinne, & Spinhoven, 2017). Moreover, a previous study on sensitivity to provocation (SP) showed that inmates exhibited lower levels of SP compared to college students (Zajenkowska, Jankowski, Lawrence, & Zajenkowski).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 87%

Hostile attribution bias among offenders and non‐offenders: Making social information processing more adequate

Zajenkowska

Prusik

Jasielska

et al. 2020

Community & Applied Soc Psy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Exploring the relationships between variables that predict hostile attributions is essential for understanding aggressive behaviours and for enabling the development of suitable aggression‐reduction interventions. The aim of this series of two studies was to investigate how ascribing intentionality and blame to other people are critical in predicting hostile attribution. In Study 1 (general sample: N = 163, 63.8% females; inmates: N = 109 people, 78.9% females), we hypothesized that people that are sensitive to provocation declare higher levels of anger and that this is serially mediated by perceived intentionality of the act and perceived blame of the harm‐doer. The results confirmed these assumptions. In Study 2, the participants took part in a 3‐month psycho‐educational training that included mentalization elements. We hypothesized that the level of hostile attributions among inmates (N = 8, females) would be lower after the training. Changes in the inmates' attributions were observed after a qualitative analysis of the results. This finding achieved the study's aim of demonstrating how such theoretical assumptions can be practically implemented.

show abstract

“…It is also possible that the association between greater proportion of emotional support provided by other inmates and higher likelihood of experiencing poor health-related self-efficacy may be driven by unmeasured confounders that may influence both source of emotional support and health-related self-efficacy. For example, personality traits corresponding to manipulation, impulsivity, and antisocial behavior that are overrepresented in incarceration populations (Schaich Borg et al, 2013; Spaans, Molendijk, de Beurs, Rinne, & Spinhoven, 2017) may account for this finding. Those with the majority of support coming from other prisoners were also less likely to have visitors and to have support from spouse/family.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Relationship Between Emotional Support and Health-Related Self-Efficacy in Older Prisoners

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Self-reported personality traits in forensic populations: a meta-analysis

Cited by 19 publications

References 83 publications

Psychopathology in parents of children with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence

Psychopathology in parents of children with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence

Hostile attribution bias among offenders and non‐offenders: Making social information processing more adequate

The Relationship Between Emotional Support and Health-Related Self-Efficacy in Older Prisoners

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About