Measuring the User Experience 2013
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-415781-1.00006-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Reported Metrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although SUS was originally designed to assess perceived usability as a single attribute, Lewis and Sauro [ 53 ] found that there are actually two factors in SUS. Eight of the questions reflect a usability factor and two reflect a learnability factor [ 54 ]. Figure 17 and Figure 18 show results per participant of the different SUS dimensions (Overall Score, Usability Dimension, Learnability Dimension) and the distribution of the aggregated results considering all tested tasks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although SUS was originally designed to assess perceived usability as a single attribute, Lewis and Sauro [ 53 ] found that there are actually two factors in SUS. Eight of the questions reflect a usability factor and two reflect a learnability factor [ 54 ]. Figure 17 and Figure 18 show results per participant of the different SUS dimensions (Overall Score, Usability Dimension, Learnability Dimension) and the distribution of the aggregated results considering all tested tasks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing the results on system usability between the two studies, we find that the system with Gaze-Guided Narratives (condition D) obtained an average SUS score of 82.81 (SD = 12.06) in the real world and 69.33 (SD = 12.31) in the CAVE (see section 4). An average SUS score above 80 has been suggested to be considered as "pretty good", while a score of 66 could be considered as average [56]. One possible explanation for this difference could be the higher degree of immersion in the real world.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the questionnaire, we use the Likert Scales [25], a series of statement to which the respondents rate their level of agreement on a 5-point scale. The rankings from 1 to 5 indicate from "Strongly Disagree" to "Strongly Agree".…”
Section: Evaluation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What's more, to avoid the "social desirability bias" [25], we collect the posttest data in a way that the evaluator did not see the responses until the participant has left, and we also made the survey itself anonymous to elicit more honest reactions. Data collected in the survey are expressed by histogram in percentage.…”
Section: Evaluation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%