Self-reported medication use validated through record linkage to national prescribing data

Abstract

ObjectivesResearchers need to be confident about the reliability of epidemiologic studies that quantify medication use through self-report. Some evidence suggests that psychiatric medications are systemically under-reported. Modern record linkage enables validation of self-report with national prescribing data as gold standard. Here, we investigated the validity of medication self-report for multiple medication types.Study Design and SettingParticipants in the Generation Scotland population-based cohort (N = 10,244) recruited 2009–2011 self-reported regular usage of several commonly prescribed medication classes. This was matched against Scottish NHS prescriptions data using 3- and 6-month fixed time windows. Potential predictors of discordant self-report, including general intelligence and psychological distress, were studied via multivariable logistic regression.ResultsAntidepressants self-report showed very good agreement (κ = 0.85, [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84–0.87]), comparable to antihypertensives (κ = 0.90 [CI 0.89–0.91]). Self-report of mood stabilizers showed moderate-poor agreement (κ = 0.42 [CI 0.33–0.50]). Relevant past medical history was the strongest predictor of self-report sensitivity, whereas general intelligence was not predictive.ConclusionIn this large population-based study, we found self-report validity varied among medication classes, with no simple relationship between psychiatric medication and under-reporting. History of indicated illness predicted more accurate self-report, for both psychiatric and nonpsychiatric medications. Although other patient-level factors influenced self-report for some medications, none predicted greater accuracy across all medications studied.

Proton pump inhibitor use and the risk of fractures among an older adult cohort

“…Furthermore, some prior studies relied on self‐reported use, while others had access to computerized pharmacy data. The latter is likely to have greater validity . Another possible explanation could be differences in the ability to control for potential confounding factors, including concomitant medication use, physical activity, smoking, BMI, ADLs or IADLs, gait speed, and exercise (all of which the present study was able to consider).…”

Leisure time physical activity and incident use of prescription tranquilizers: A longitudinal population-based study

“…Self-reported use of prescription tranquilizers is expected to be reliable and valid (Haapea et al, 2010;Hafferty et al, 2018;Rauma et al, 2013). Use of prescription tranquilizer medication was asked in the Tromsø VI (2007-08) questionnaire as: "How often have you used prescription tranquilizers during the last four weeks?"…”

Improving prescribing through big data approaches—Ten years of the Scottish Prescribing Information System

“…A total of 267 publications were identified over the period January 2009 to March 2019. After screening titles and abstracts, and removing duplicates and conference abstracts, 40 full publication articles were included and reviewed . The number of articles published by year for the period 2014–2018, totalling 37, is presented in Figure A; a further 3 studies were published in the first months of 2019.…”